My Communities

Unrealistic goals are goals that are not achievable, doable, or practical. Generally, these goals set higher standards than the individual or team can reach. They can be expensive and time-consuming, leading to feelings of frustration and despair when the failure occurs.

Unrealistic goals are goals that are not attainable, doable, or practical. These goals are set by individuals or teams with unrealistic expectations of their abilities and potential. They set overly ambitious, unrealistic goals, and frequently impossible to meet. Such goals force you to work harder than ever to achieve them but ultimately lead to frustration and failure.

Thank you for for sharing your knowledge its was very usefully to help me understand this topic. I hope i can use every knowledge that learn here.

Unrealistic targets are targets that are not reasonable and achievable within the context of time and available resources. Unrealistic targets can be time consuming and inefficient with the use of resources. It is very important to be able to determine if a target is unrealistic and to adjust the target to a reasonable one.

Congratulations and thank you for sharing your knowledge's. it helped me to make my acquired knowledge more clear.

Targets must tread the balance of being ambitious and realistic. An overly ambitious target such as "reaching 100% of the population in a security compromised location" may look good on paper but would be impossible to achieve given the complexities and unpredictability of working n a security compromised location. This may distort the actual impact of the implementation by disregarding the good work being done in spite of the challenges and demotivate project staff.

In my opinion, unrealistic targets cost the organization and the project in aspects of funds, time, deliverables and personnel allocation. In terms of funds if available, can be injected in a project which in the end will no deliver as required. Further more unrealistic targets influence the kind of personnel that is required in the project hence affecting the quality of services. The other concern is that some donnas after realizing the status of targets in terms of their realistic nature, may end up holding their funds.

unrealistic targets mean that the objectives set cannot be achieved. It is important to take time to set objectives by consulting project managers who have already worked on the same project, and to consult stakeholders and funding bodies.

setting realistic targets is crucial for assessing project effectiveness. Unrealistic targets may compromise the evaluation process. Ensure your goals align with available resources, timelines, and the project's overall scope

Unrealistic targets are a challenging part of a project work. There are a number of factors that lead to setting unrealistic expectations: lack of careful planning, inaccurate estimation of costs, resources and time required; ineffective communication between all the participants involved in the project.

these may include unrealistic deadlines, failure to put into consideration external factors...…

Define Clear Objectives:
Clearly outline the purpose and objectives of the data collection. Understand what specific information you need to gather and how it aligns with your project or research goals.

Choose the Right Method:
Select appropriate data collection methods, such as surveys, interviews, observations, or a combination based on your research questions and the nature of the data.

Setting targets that are overly optimistic or unrealistic can have negative consequences for a project. Unrealistic targets may lead to disappointment, demotivation, and a loss of credibility. Here are some key points to consider regarding the drawbacks of unrealistic targets:

To address these challenges, it's crucial to strike a balance between setting ambitious targets that drive performance and ensuring they are realistic and achievable. Regular monitoring, evaluation, and, if necessary, adjustments to targets can help maintain a healthy balance and keep the project on track. Additionally, involving stakeholders in the target-setting process and considering historical trends and baseline data contribute to more realistic goal-setting.

I agree with you ! Unrealistic targets may lead to disappointment, demotivation, and a loss of credibility, so to have negative impact of the project.

unrealistic targets mean that the objectives set cannot be achieved. It is important to take time to set objectives by consulting project managers who have already worked on the same project, and to consult stakeholders and funding bodies.

unrealistic targets mean that the objectives set cannot be achieved. It is important to take time to set objectives by consulting project managers who have already worked on the same project, and to consult stakeholders and funding bodies.

unrealistic targets,
they are missing % or date for example.
the children's enrollment is higher this year than next year

Unrealistic targets in a project design can be a major obstacle to success, causing wasted resources, frustration, and damage to project credibility.

Unrealistic Targets may show up in the following scenarios:
Overly ambitious goals: Setting goals that are significantly beyond what is achievable within the given timeframe, budget, and resources. This leads to missed deadlines, incomplete deliverables, and disappointment.
Ignoring dependencies and constraints: Failing to consider dependencies between project tasks or overlooking resource limitations when defining targets. This results in bottlenecks, schedule delays, and inefficient resource allocation.
Underestimating complexity and challenges: Not accounting for potential difficulties and unforeseen circumstances that can arise during project execution. This leads to inadequate risk management and unpreparedness for setbacks.
Misaligned targets with stakeholder expectations: Setting targets that don't reflect the priorities and expectations of key stakeholders, leading to dissatisfaction and potential conflict.
Focusing on immediate outcomes over long-term impact: Prioritizing short-term deliverables while neglecting the project's broader goals and long-term impact on beneficiaries or the target population.

Numerous Implications of Unrealistic Targets abound such as: Project failure; Resource waste; De-motivation and decreased morale; Misinterpretation of progress and impact; Damage to credibility and trust; etc.

Unrealistic Targets can be Prevented through:
Conducting thorough needs assessments and feasibility studies.
Setting SMART goals (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound).
Involving stakeholders in target setting and decision-making.
Considering potential risks and challenges during planning.
Maintaining a balance between ambition and realism.
Monitoring progress and adapting targets as needed.
By proactively addressing the issue of unrealistic targets, project teams can improve their chances of success and maximize the positive impact of their work.

Unrealistic targets in a project design can be a major obstacle to success, causing wasted resources, frustration, and damage to project credibility.

Unrealistic Targets may show up in the following scenarios:
Overly ambitious goals: Setting goals that are significantly beyond what is achievable within the given timeframe, budget, and resources. This leads to missed deadlines, incomplete deliverables, and disappointment.
Ignoring dependencies and constraints: Failing to consider dependencies between project tasks or overlooking resource limitations when defining targets. This results in bottlenecks, schedule delays, and inefficient resource allocation.
Underestimating complexity and challenges: Not accounting for potential difficulties and unforeseen circumstances that can arise during project execution. This leads to inadequate risk management and unpreparedness for setbacks.
Misaligned targets with stakeholder expectations: Setting targets that don't reflect the priorities and expectations of key stakeholders, leading to dissatisfaction and potential conflict.
Focusing on immediate outcomes over long-term impact: Prioritizing short-term deliverables while neglecting the project's broader goals and long-term impact on beneficiaries or the target population.

Numerous Implications of Unrealistic Targets abound such as: Project failure; Resource waste; Demotivation and decreased morale; Misinterpretation of progress and impact; Damage to credibility and trust; etc.

Unrealistic Targets can be Prevented through:
Conducting thorough needs assessments and feasibility studies.
Setting SMART goals (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound).
Involving stakeholders in target setting and decision-making.
Considering potential risks and challenges during planning.
Maintaining a balance between ambition and realism.
Monitoring progress and adapting targets as needed.
By proactively addressing the issue of unrealistic targets, project teams can improve their chances of success and maximize the positive impact of their work.

Unrealistic targets in a project design can be a major obstacle to success, causing wasted resources, frustration, and damage to project credibility.

Unrealistic Targets may show up in the following scenarios:
Overly ambitious goals: Setting goals that are significantly beyond what is achievable within the given timeframe, budget, and resources. This leads to missed deadlines, incomplete deliverables, and disappointment.
Ignoring dependencies and constraints: Failing to consider dependencies between project tasks or overlooking resource limitations when defining targets. This results in bottlenecks, schedule delays, and inefficient resource allocation.
Underestimating complexity and challenges: Not accounting for potential difficulties and unforeseen circumstances that can arise during project execution. This leads to inadequate risk management and unpreparedness for setbacks.
Misaligned targets with stakeholder expectations: Setting targets that don't reflect the priorities and expectations of key stakeholders, leading to dissatisfaction and potential conflict.
Focusing on immediate outcomes over long-term impact: Prioritizing short-term deliverables while neglecting the project's broader goals and long-term impact on beneficiaries or the target population.

Numerous Implications of Unrealistic Targets abound such as: Project failure; Resource waste; Demotivation and decreased morale; Misinterpretation of progress and impact; Damage to credibility and trust; etc.

Unrealistic Targets can be Prevented through:
Conducting thorough needs assessments and feasibility studies.
Setting SMART goals (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound).
Involving stakeholders in target setting and decision-making.
Considering potential risks and challenges during planning.
Maintaining a balance between ambition and realism.
Monitoring progress and adapting targets as needed.
By proactively addressing the issue of unrealistic targets, project teams can improve their chances of success and maximize the positive impact of their work.

Unrealistic targets in a project design can be a major obstacle to success, causing wasted resources, frustration, and damage to project credibility.

Unrealistic Targets may show up in the following scenarios:
Overly ambitious goals: Setting goals that are significantly beyond what is achievable within the given timeframe, budget, and resources. This leads to missed deadlines, incomplete deliverables, and disappointment.
Ignoring dependencies and constraints: Failing to consider dependencies between project tasks or overlooking resource limitations when defining targets. This results in bottlenecks, schedule delays, and inefficient resource allocation.
Underestimating complexity and challenges: Not accounting for potential difficulties and unforeseen circumstances that can arise during project execution. This leads to inadequate risk management and unpreparedness for setbacks.
Misaligned targets with stakeholder expectations: Setting targets that don't reflect the priorities and expectations of key stakeholders, leading to dissatisfaction and potential conflict.
Focusing on immediate outcomes over long-term impact: Prioritizing short-term deliverables while neglecting the project's broader goals and long-term impact on beneficiaries or the target population.

Numerous Implications of Unrealistic Targets abound such as: Project failure; Resource waste; Demotivation and decreased morale; Misinterpretation of progress and impact; Damage to credibility and trust; etc.

Unrealistic Targets can be Prevented through:
Conducting thorough needs assessments and feasibility studies.
Setting SMART goals (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound).
Involving stakeholders in target setting and decision-making.
Considering potential risks and challenges during planning.
Maintaining a balance between ambition and realism.
Monitoring progress and adapting targets as needed.
By proactively addressing the issue of unrealistic targets, project teams can improve their chances of success and maximize the positive impact of their work.

Unrealistic targets in a project design can be a major obstacle to success, causing wasted resources, frustration, and damage to project credibility.

Unrealistic Targets may show up in the following scenarios:
Overly ambitious goals: Setting goals that are significantly beyond what is achievable within the given timeframe, budget, and resources. This leads to missed deadlines, incomplete deliverables, and disappointment.
Ignoring dependencies and constraints: Failing to consider dependencies between project tasks or overlooking resource limitations when defining targets. This results in bottlenecks, schedule delays, and inefficient resource allocation.
Underestimating complexity and challenges: Not accounting for potential difficulties and unforeseen circumstances that can arise during project execution. This leads to inadequate risk management and unpreparedness for setbacks.
Misaligned targets with stakeholder expectations: Setting targets that don't reflect the priorities and expectations of key stakeholders, leading to dissatisfaction and potential conflict.
Focusing on immediate outcomes over long-term impact: Prioritizing short-term deliverables while neglecting the project's broader goals and long-term impact on beneficiaries or the target population.

Numerous Implications of Unrealistic Targets abound such as: Project failure; Resource waste; Demotivation and decreased morale; Misinterpretation of progress and impact; Damage to credibility and trust; etc.

Unrealistic Targets can be Prevented through:
Conducting thorough needs assessments and feasibility studies.
Setting SMART goals (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound).
Involving stakeholders in target setting and decision-making.
Considering potential risks and challenges during planning.
Maintaining a balance between ambition and realism.
Monitoring progress and adapting targets as needed.
By proactively addressing the issue of unrealistic targets, project teams can improve their chances of success and maximize the positive impact of their work.

Unrealistic targets in a project design can be a major obstacle to success, causing wasted resources, frustration, and damage to project credibility.

Unrealistic Targets may show up in the following scenarios:
Overly ambitious goals: Setting goals that are significantly beyond what is achievable within the given timeframe, budget, and resources. This leads to missed deadlines, incomplete deliverables, and disappointment.
Ignoring dependencies and constraints: Failing to consider dependencies between project tasks or overlooking resource limitations when defining targets. This results in bottlenecks, schedule delays, and inefficient resource allocation.
Underestimating complexity and challenges: Not accounting for potential difficulties and unforeseen circumstances that can arise during project execution. This leads to inadequate risk management and unpreparedness for setbacks.
Misaligned targets with stakeholder expectations: Setting targets that don't reflect the priorities and expectations of key stakeholders, leading to dissatisfaction and potential conflict.
Focusing on immediate outcomes over long-term impact: Prioritizing short-term deliverables while neglecting the project's broader goals and long-term impact on beneficiaries or the target population.

Numerous Implications of Unrealistic Targets abound such as: Project failure; Resource waste; Demotivation and decreased morale; Misinterpretation of progress and impact; Damage to credibility and trust; etc.

Unrealistic Targets can be Prevented through:
Conducting thorough needs assessments and feasibility studies.
Setting SMART goals (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound).
Involving stakeholders in target setting and decision-making.
Considering potential risks and challenges during planning.
Maintaining a balance between ambition and realism.
Monitoring progress and adapting targets as needed.
By proactively addressing the issue of unrealistic targets, project teams can improve their chances of success and maximize the positive impact of their work.

Setting unrealistic targets makes monitoring difficult and ultimately not easy to evaluate since those targets cannot be met.

It is crucial for road projects in Malawi to set targets that are realistic, taking into account the country's specific conditions, available resources, and the capacity of the local construction industry. Unrealistic targets can lead to adverse consequences, affecting the long-term sustainability and success of road infrastructure projects.

Unrealistic targets in a project design can be a major obstacle to success, causing wasted resources, frustration, and damage to project credibility.

Unrealistic Targets may show up in the following scenarios:
Overly ambitious goals: Setting goals that are significantly beyond what is achievable within the given timeframe, budget, and resources. This leads to missed deadlines, incomplete deliverables, and disappointment.
Ignoring dependencies and constraints: Failing to consider dependencies between project tasks or overlooking resource limitations when defining targets. This results in bottlenecks, schedule delays, and inefficient resource allocation.
Underestimating complexity and challenges: Not accounting for potential difficulties and unforeseen circumstances that can arise during project execution. This leads to inadequate risk management and unpreparedness for setbacks.
Misaligned targets with stakeholder expectations: Setting targets that don't reflect the priorities and expectations of key stakeholders, leading to dissatisfaction and potential conflict.
Focusing on immediate outcomes over long-term impact: Prioritizing short-term deliverables while neglecting the project's broader goals and long-term impact on beneficiaries or the target population.

Numerous Implications of Unrealistic Targets abound such as: Project failure; Resource waste; Demotivation and decreased morale; Misinterpretation of progress and impact; Damage to credibility and trust; etc.

Unrealistic Targets can be Prevented through:
Conducting thorough needs assessments and feasibility studies.
Setting SMART goals (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound).
Involving stakeholders in target setting and decision-making.
Considering potential risks and challenges during planning.
Maintaining a balance between ambition and realism.
Monitoring progress and adapting targets as needed.
By proactively addressing the issue of unrealistic targets, project teams can improve their chances of success and maximize the positive impact of their work.

Unrealistic targets in project management can lead to frustration, demotivation, and the potential failure of the project. It's essential to set targets that are challenging yet achievable. Here are some examples of unrealistic targets and potential consequences:

Excessive Increase in Workshop Attendance:

Unrealistic Target: Achieve a 200% increase in workshop attendance in the first month.
Consequence: This might be unattainable due to limited awareness and resources, leading to disappointment and a lack of credibility.
Rapid Reduction in Non-Recyclable Waste:

Unrealistic Target: Achieve a 50% reduction in non-recyclable waste within the first week of waste management implementation.
Consequence: Such a rapid reduction may not be feasible due to behavioral changes taking time, and failure to meet the target can demoralize the project team.
Extreme Increase in Biodiversity in a Short Time:

Unrealistic Target: Achieve a 50% increase in biodiversity within the first three months of habitat restoration.
Consequence: Natural processes take time, and setting such a short-term target may not be realistic, leading to disappointment.
Unrealistic Household Participation in Community Gardens:

Unrealistic Target: Achieve 100% household participation in community gardens within the first month.
Consequence: Complete household participation is unlikely due to various reasons, and failure to achieve this target can undermine the project's credibility.
Overly Ambitious Funding Expectations:

Unrealistic Target: Secure 100% of project funding from grants within a week.
Consequence: Grant processes usually take time, and setting such a short timeline may result in financial challenges and project delays.
It's crucial to set targets that are SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound) and take into account the project's context, resources, and constraints. Regularly reviewing and adjusting targets based on progress and challenges is a good practice in project management.

Unrealistic targets can often put pressure on team members. Partners and donors might also lose confidence in the success of the project.

Setting unrealistic targets can have detrimental effects on projects, teams, and individuals. Unrealistic targets can lead to stress, burnout, demotivation, and ultimately result in the failure to achieve the intended goals. It's essential to establish targets that are challenging yet attainable. Here are some considerations when dealing with unrealistic targets:

Assessment of Feasibility:

Before setting targets, conduct a thorough assessment of the resources, time, and capabilities available. Evaluate whether the proposed targets align with these factors.
Clear Communication:

Clearly communicate the reasons behind the targets and the expectations associated with them. Transparency about the rationale and potential challenges can foster understanding and collaboration.
Realistic Timeframes:

Ensure that the timeframes allocated for achieving targets are realistic. Rushing a project or task can compromise quality and lead to errors.
Resource Allocation:

Assess whether the required resources, including human resources, finances, and technology, are sufficient to meet the targets. Inadequate resources can significantly impact the feasibility of achieving goals.
Consultation with Stakeholders:

Involve relevant stakeholders, including team members, in the target-setting process. Gather input and feedback to ensure that the targets are perceived as reasonable and achievable.
Flexibility and Adaptability:

Build flexibility into targets to accommodate unforeseen challenges or changes in circumstances. This flexibility allows for adjustments without compromising the overall objectives.
Breakdown of Targets:

Break down larger targets into smaller, manageable tasks or milestones. This approach makes the overall goal more achievable and provides a sense of progress.
Monitoring and Evaluation:

Establish a robust monitoring and evaluation system to track progress regularly. If targets are consistently unrealistic, adjustments can be made in a timely manner.
Skill and Capacity Development:

Assess whether the team possesses the necessary skills and capacity to meet the targets. If not, consider providing training or additional support to enhance capabilities.
Celebrate Achievements:

Acknowledge and celebrate milestones and achievements along the way. Recognizing progress can motivate individuals and teams to stay committed to the overall targets.
Continuous Improvement:

Encourage a culture of continuous improvement. Regularly review targets, assess what worked and what didn't, and make adjustments for future initiatives.
Risk Management:

Identify potential risks that could impact the achievement of targets and develop contingency plans to mitigate these risks.
Open Communication Channels:

Foster an environment where team members feel comfortable expressing concerns or providing feedback on the feasibility of targets. Open communication can surface issues early on, allowing for timely intervention.
Reduction or Modification of Targets:

If targets prove consistently unattainable despite efforts, be willing to reassess and modify them. It's better to adjust targets based on realistic assessments than to persist with unattainable goals.
Remember, setting realistic targets is not about lowering standards but rather ensuring that the objectives are challenging yet feasible, promoting a healthy and sustainable approach to achieving success.

As we learned, Unrealistic Targets are usually not attainable, they are not even practical. It may result from not knowing exactly our team's ability and potential, and what we can achieve at a particular time in our project implementation, which will lead to setting overly ambitious, unrealistic targets, that are frequently impossible to meet.

Unrealistic targets are goals that are set beyond the realm of practical achievement, often lacking feasibility within a given context. Such targets may be overly ambitious, surpassing available resources, time constraints, or existing capabilities. Unrealistic targets can demoralize teams, leading to a decline in motivation and productivity. They may also result in wasted efforts as individuals strive to meet unattainable objectives. Ultimately, setting unrealistic targets can undermine the success of projects or organizations by fostering an environment of frustration and unmet expectations.

Unrealistic targets are goals that are set beyond the realm of practical achievement, often lacking feasibility within a given context. Such targets may be overly ambitious, surpassing available resources, time constraints, or existing capabilities. Unrealistic targets can demoralize teams, leading to a decline in motivation and productivity. They may also result in wasted efforts as individuals strive to meet unattainable objectives. Ultimately, setting unrealistic targets can undermine the success of projects or organizations by fostering an environment of frustration and unmet expectations.

am excited to be part of this course. Am Joseph Chipeta from Malawi

1. To achieve 90 percent of PLHIV knowing their status
2. To achieve 81 per cent of PLHIV having viral load suppression
3. To reduce new HIV infections to 18,000 or fever by 2020
4. Achieve Zero stigma and discrimination by 2020
5. To contribute to the reduction of HIV incidence by scaling up VMMC to reach 90% of HIV-negative, sexually active men between the ages of 10-49, with a focus on individuals between the ages of 15-29 by 2020.
6. To integrate and expand coverage of STI screening and management
7. To increase the coverage and uptake of HTS and strengthen existing linkages to treatment, care and support services.
8. To strengthen TB/HIV services including high-quality DOTS expansion and address multidrug resistant (MDR) TB.
9. To prevent HIV infection in negative people who are at substantial risk of HIV exposure.

Setting unrealistic targets makes monitoring difficult and ultimately not easy to evaluate since those targets cannot be met.

Unrealistic targets indicates that team doesn’t have any facts related to the problem, or team doesn’t have any skill to plan, experience. If team set unrealistic target the actual achieved target and planned target’s variance would be too high.

The project has already implemented then team wanted to adjust the targets. In that case can we adjust the target? Fund is same, work of scope is same. Team wanted to increase the target numbers

This are target not included in the target that u plan and they help to make the project if needs some collection

I Worked in a project where the set final target was to provide housing to at least 20 individuals a month, after only 4 months of the project start.
This was unrealistic for a multitude of reasons; including but not limited to:

• Not enough housing available
• Program had no funding for damage deposit, neither did the clients
• Individuals with addictions have issues remaining housed
• Individuals with addictions are less likely to connect with Case manager and follow case work
• Referrals were not being received because no information about program had been given to referring partners

This actually caused severe issues with the funder, because the expectations set by the project manager and director of the organization were not met and were unable to be met in the set time frame.

Unrealistic targets refer to goals, objectives, or benchmarks that are set at a level that is difficult or nearly impossible to achieve given the available resources, time, or other constraints.

Unrealistic targets do not show the high expectations of the project manager but it maybe the cause of project failure.

I also think that the target would be realist which can be achieved.

Unrealistic targets refer to goals, objectives, or benchmarks that are set at a level that is difficult or nearly impossible to achieve given the available resources, time, or other constraints.

The right target setup is quite difficult without the baseline research for setting targets.

The discussion in module 3 allowed us to understand the importance of setting ambitious but realistic objectives. for this reason we must base ourselves on past studies to have an idea of ​​the reference situation of our indicator before setting our objective. even after having set our objective, we must follow its evolution over time in order to be able to revise our objective

The discussion in module 3 allowed us to understand the importance of setting ambitious but realistic objectives. for this reason we must base ourselves on past studies to have an idea of ​​the reference situation of our indicator before setting our objective. even after having set our objective, we must follow its evolution over time in order to be able to revise our objective

It's important to put a target that can easily be achieved.

An unrealistic target is a goal or objective that is not achievable within the given constraints, resources, or timeframe. It often exceeds reasonable expectations or practical limits. Unrealistic targets may arise from overestimating capabilities, underestimating challenges, or lacking a clear understanding of the factors influencing goal attainment.

Unrealistic targets are targets that have;
Overly Ambitious Objectives: Setting objectives that are too ambitious or beyond the capacity and resources available for the project can lead to failure. It's important to set goals that are challenging but still achievable.

Unrealistic Timeframes: Setting extremely tight deadlines without considering the complexities and challenges of the project can lead to rushed and poor-quality outcomes. It's crucial to have realistic timelines that allow for unforeseen obstacles.

Inflated Budgets: Allocating funds that are significantly higher than what is realistically needed for the project can result in inefficient resource utilization. A well-defined and accurate budget is essential for project success.

In my understanding, unrealistic targets refers to any targets that are hard to achieve within the proposed project scope, or targets that are hard to measure with the available tools which might be costly. Therefore, when we design project, we need to set realistic targets as possible.

As in the previous module, I seem to have difficulty navigating this "reply" portion, as well as understanding what am I replying to. What I will do instead is to offer my reflections on the module.

I agree that an important part of monitoring and evaluation is how to avoid setting unrealistic targets. Unrealistic targets can be a product of underestimating or overestimating the capabilities of the organization. This is why baseline data or benchmarking is important. Having realistic targets will minimize frustration for the organization since logically, realistic targets will generally be hit while unrealistic targets will be missed/not achieved.

I like that you mention the balancing act when it comes to setting a target that is both achievable given the time and resources but is also ambitious. A target that is achievable but is lacking in ambitiousness will have a muted impact and is thus less desirable compared to something that is high-impact.

Setting unrealistic targets in a Nutrition Policy Advocacy project can undermine its effectiveness. Unrealistic targets may include achieving drastic changes in a short time frame, such as eliminating a widespread nutritional issue entirely. It's essential to consider the feasibility of goals based on available resources, societal context, and the complexity of the problem. Unrealistic targets could also involve expecting rapid behavioral changes without addressing underlying social, economic, or cultural factors. Striking a balance between ambition and practicality is crucial for a successful nutrition policy advocacy project.

A target is unrealistic if you are biased and does not rely on any data or baseline to guide you.
Setting higher target is good, but you should have some historical trend about what may already be available or had happened previously.(bench Mark).

Unrealistic Targets are those targets that won't be met as it is not realizable or practical. It can be ambitious yes but it has be traced back and backed up with the achievements the programmes had before. It might be higher than that if the indicators gives a green light. If not that the targets at least to be kept within the previous target ranges. So if it exceeds or gets more lower that the targets becomes unrealistic.

I think I have answered it before already

Setting unrealistic targets can be detrimental to the project, especially because they are difficult to achieve. However, targets are always adjustable therefore we can always go back and set more realistic targets

I think it can be difficult to set targets when doing something that is a relatively new concept, or if you are new to the world of M&E.

unrealistic objectives are not measurable in time, on the budget

unrealistic objectives are not measurable in time, on the budget

I think this module did a great job of defining realistic versus unrealistic targets. This provided a helpful and insightful look into targets.

Unrealistic goals often lead to inaccurate planning. Unrealistic goals can worsen productivity rather than improve it. That's because if you're constantly pushing your team to achieve the impossible, they're going to start cutting corners in order to try to meet those goals. This can result in sloppy work, missed deadlines, and wasted resources—all of which hurt your bottom line. When team members realize that their targets are not feasible, they tend to become discouraged rather than more motivated. Overly ambitious target can also lead team members to take excessive risks in order to achieve them.

Targets shouldn't be unrealistic, but rather should be something that is achievable - without any emotions - something which the data can back up.

Some bosses assign impossible deadlines, force their employees to work later than expected, put more pressure on certain employees instead of others, or give their workers unmanageable amounts of work.

Unrealistic targets are those you can theoretically achieve but practically are impossible due to other factors.i.e inadequate funds,time and human power

Unrealistic targets are those that you want to achieve but you don't have the required or necessary skills or resources.

Thanks for this information

What a great way to learn about indicators and targets, I have learnt that indicators are things that you measure to determine your success and different indicators that I have learnt and targets gave me a different perspective and I love it.

Unrealistic targets can cause you to lose the impact that you want to create, You must Have targets that are realistic and the quantity, quality and efficiency of the targets are important.

If i start at zero, how much are target going to be enough for monitoring and evaluation? How do we know this substaincial for us to measure?

unrealistic targets,
they are missing % or date for example.
the children's enrollment is higher this year than next year

unrealistic targets,
they are missing % or date for example.
the children's enrollment is higher this year than next year its become over 5% of last yr

unrealistic targets,
they are missing % or date for example.
the children's enrollment is higher this year than next year its become over 5% of last yr

interesting to learn that targets should be ambitious but realistic.I am conflicted on how to settle on a target in a team setting using this criteria especially because individuals level of realistic and ambition is different .I am also curious to learn on the baseline selection especially when you choose to go the already existing source.What happens if two similar independent projects have been carried out and they give totally conflicting information?how do you settle for your best fit?

When setting targets, they should be achievable within the time frame and budget of the project.

Well to me unrealistic targets will be putting yourself, team and the project under an unnecessary amount of stress. It's good to be an overachiever but sometimes especially when dealing with big projects it's best you cut clothes according to your size

Unrealistic targets are targets set without an informed knowledge with data. Budget, trend, baseline data, researches carried out in line with the proposed project are examples of data that's should be checked before setting realistic targets

Data management involves all the processes form collection, to entry ,to collation to analysis to interpretation , to report and to storage of data

By Placing unrealistic targets, we will not be able to see the success of our projects. Therefore, before setting targets, we need good situation analysis. And need to set realistic targets.

By Placing unrealistic targets, we will not be able to see the success of our projects. Therefore, before setting targets, we need good situation analysis. And need to set realistic targets.

Setting unrealistic targets will be a big issue when you measure the progress of the project

Setting unrealistic targets will be a big issue when you measure the progress of the project

Unrealistic targets are targets that cannot be achieved by our current status. it might arise for different reasons. the first is that it may be due to fact that the basiline information may not be distorted

Through this lesson, i noted that if someone plans to start a projet whithout taking account budget and others resources , the targets to achieve will be unrealistic. So it's good to adjust indicators and targets to the local context and budget we have

Unrealistic targets will guide us to the wrong goals. We could not be able to draw a Project and implement efficiently. If the targets are not real, consequently the objectives of the project will be unrealistic. And in this situation it won't be possible to implement the project, the project is predestinated to failure.

Setting unrealistic targets in a project can have detrimental effects on its overall success. Unrealistic targets often lead to skewed expectations, causing frustration among team members and stakeholders. These targets may strain available resources, jeopardize the quality of project deliverables, and erode team morale. Moreover, unrealistic goals can undermine the credibility of the project, creating a sense of distrust among stakeholders. It is crucial to establish targets that are ambitious yet attainable, considering the project's scope, available resources, and external constraints. A realistic approach to goal-setting fosters a more positive work environment, encourages sustainable progress, and enhances the likelihood of achieving meaningful outcomes.

One problem we have in M&E is setting unrealistic target

One problem we have in M&E is setting unrealistic target

Unrealistic targets are done out of an attempt to impress donors sometimes, its very important to set realizable target within project scope or else project may began to struggle during reporting period fabricating data that do not exist. Baseline information is great too for setting realistic target but most organization would set target even for baseline with bias, already made up their mind on what should be.

I do not see a prompt here about what specifically we are supposed to discuss, so I will share some thoughts on unrealistic targets.. In my experience, sometimes boards will impose unrealistic targets without really understanding the work that would have to be done to achieve those targets and the resources required. When setting targets, I think it is important to focus on quality as well as quantity, to ensure that your activities are actually achieving meaningful results.

Unrealistic targets do not have baselines that is established either from a reliable source, getting first hand data or starting from zero. Additionally, unrealistic targets tend not be based on historical trends.

Unrealistic targets in monitoring and evaluation can be problematic for several reasons. Let's discuss some of the key issues associated with setting unrealistic targets:

Loss of Credibility: When targets are set too high and are clearly unattainable, it can lead to a loss of credibility for the project or organization. Stakeholders, including donors and beneficiaries, may question the validity of the project's goals and outcomes.

Demotivation: Unrealistic targets can demotivate project staff and beneficiaries. When people see that the targets are impossible to achieve, they may become disheartened and less committed to the project's objectives.

Misallocation of Resources: Setting unrealistic targets can lead to a misallocation of resources. Projects may allocate too many resources to certain activities in an attempt to meet unattainable targets, which can result in inefficiencies.

Data Manipulation: In some cases, project staff may resort to data manipulation to make it appear as though targets are being met when they are not. This can undermine the integrity of the monitoring and evaluation process.

Impact on Sustainability: Unrealistic targets can also have long-term consequences on the sustainability of a project. If targets are consistently set too high and not achieved, it can erode trust in the project, making it difficult to secure future funding or support.

To address these issues, it's essential to set targets that are both challenging yet achievable. Targets should be based on realistic assessments of the project's capacity, resources, and external factors that may influence success. Regular reviews and adjustments of targets are also important to ensure that they remain relevant and attainable throughout the project's lifecycle.

Is are target that is unachievable.

Some targets may become unrealistic depending on the occurrence of some unpredictable issues which happened during project implementation.

There is no prompt showing here. But I certainly agree its important to keep a balance between ambitious and realistic targets. And to know that nothing is set in stone, so nothing is lost if one were to go back and adjust their targets.

I feel that I'm getting closer to my goal. This module has been truly engaging, and although it has required a significant time investment, I'm confident that I'm on the right path to achieving my objectives. The complexity of the material has pushed me to push my boundaries, and every step taken reinforces my belief in my ability to master these concepts. With perseverance and commitment, I am confident that I will not only overcome the remaining challenges but also excel in the entire program. The satisfaction of making progress toward my goals further motivates me to continue with determination.

Its always advisable to set ambitious target because it helps the team to give their best realization of the goal. The targets should be realistic too. Targets are subject to change in the course of the project. This may be due to some risk coming to play or other unavoidable factors but its always advisable not to change the initial target which is the goal of the project. factors that could affect setting of target are funds, target of donors.
indicators are those things that we measure which tells us if our project is successful or not. each level of the logframe has its indicator and this can be tested by the following to see if the indicator is suitable; the usefulness to management, is it disaggregate, objective, direct, adjustable, adequate, relatable.
The baseline is the starting point of an indicator e.g every project must have been done before by someone and there was some notable progress done so every project builds on an existing progress achieved previously so that point of starting for your project from where others left off is your baseline and if nothing has been done regarding the project before then your baseline will be zero.

Its always advisable to set ambitious target because it helps the team to give their best realization of the goal. The targets should be realistic too. Targets are subject to change in the course of the project. This may be due to some risk coming to play or other unavoidable factors but its always advisable not to change the initial target which is the goal of the project. factors that could affect setting of target are funds, target of donors.
indicators are those things that we measure which tells us if our project is successful or not. each level of the logframe has its indicator and this can be tested by the following to see if the indicator is suitable; the usefulness to management, is it disaggregate, objective, direct, adjustable, adequate, relatable.
The baseline is the starting point of an indicator e.g every project must have been done before by someone and there was some notable progress done so every project builds on an existing progress achieved previously so that point of starting for your project from where others left off is your baseline and if nothing has been done regarding the project before then your baseline will be zero.
The data collection tool explained is the Participants Tracking Form which is used to collect quantitative data. This tool is used for any project that involves human participants. It is an observation tool. The steps to creating the form includes the following: a) Understand your indicator b) Decide which type of information to be recorded. c) Decide how your form will be filled d) Create your form e) test your form f) Revise your form.
Meta data is information that explains how your data was collected and the include the following: the title of the tool, who used the tool, the version of the tool, where they used the tool and when he used the tool.
Instructions and codes must be clearly stated at the end of the Tracking Participants Form. The meta data is be out at the top of the form and data collected from participants should be recorded in tables with columns and rows. a row should be assigned to a specific participants data.
The form should require only relevant data and it should be simple to use and understand.

Please, how do I see previous discussions on this topic

Les objectifs irréaliste peuvent être des objectifs qui ne tiennent compte du contexte. Ce sont aussi des objectifs fixés non sur la base des données existantes mais sur la ressentis et les humeurs des acteurs du projet. Un objectifs irréaliste sort de l'ordinaire

Unrealistic targets are not based on sufficient information and data. This type of target is usually based on biases and assumptions rather than the real facts on the ground.

unrealistic targets refer to goals or objectives that are set at levels that are difficult or impossible to achieve within the given context, resources, or timeframes.Unrealistic targets can arise due to a lack of understanding of the context, over-optimism, inadequate data, or unrealistic expectations. such as Failing to consider external factors or circumstances that may affect the program's performance. For instance, setting agricultural production targets without accounting for unpredictable weather conditions or market fluctuations.