My Communities

Yes, identifying interim outcomes is very important because it helps Most advocates not to track outputs but real outcomes. As outputs are just what we do produce, while outcomes are changes you inspire in others
or changes in your own power

Yes it is very necessary. It helps to see if you’re taking the right strategy.

Yes interim outcome is important because its specified and has a time frame on when things should be done and when it should be done

I must say that this topic has been very helpful. I have been wondering how to assess the impact of advocacy efforts. The tools recommended here are easy to understand and effective.

I must say that this topic has been very helpful. I have been wondering how to assess the impact of advocacy efforts. The tools recommended here are easy to understand and effective.

outcomes will determine to measure your outputs.

I believe identifying interim outcomes is always necessary because how can you know where you're headed if you haven't set any goals? If the goal is too far in the future you may become disheartened at not making progress quick enough and less likely to accomplish it.

I was looking forward to get to this module as how to run Advocacy evaluation was a big question I had. The differentiation on assessing outputs and outcomes stood out to me, as well as the importance of assessing interim outomes.

I would like to say that the interim outcome is very much important and play a major role for sure .

I would like to say that interim outcomes are better known as shorter-term results that must be achieved in order to reach the advocacy goal as a fact

Yes, I totally agree with you but it is also true that it will definitely help us in understanding in depth and to gain the complete understanding of the concept for sure

This module is complex, there's a lot of information in it, ones have to pay attention to understand it very well.

Yes, indeed it is very essential and necessary for sure .

This is very necessary because as an advocator it will enable you to access weather you are in the right track of achieving your bigger goal. Making you know weather you are in the correct track of events or weather their are things that you need to change immediately for the realization of your bigger picture.

It's very necessary as it change the way decision maker change outcome.

Use evalution for learning as much as you can and learnt to select data as well.

Necessary but unaccepted sometimes

Of a necessity, interim outcomes is essential since it acts as the major yardstick for evaluating your win, it also let's one know if what one is working on is truly effective or not.

I firmly believe that interim outcomes or short-term results act as a catalyst for midterm advocacy tactics and strategy formulation to achieve a "Win". A viable asset interim outcome will be helpful for future adjustments in tactics on the key audience targeted. It is conceptually recommendable for advocacy strategy.

Of a necessity, interim outcomes is essential since it acts as the major yardstick for evaluating your win, it also let's one know if what one is working on is truly effective or not.

That's so true.

Kindly throw more light my dear, so we can learn from your points of view.

Thank you.

This module really helped put in perspective the outputs and outcomes an organization has and how it relates to advocacy. I liked that in the presentation, there were examples given for each outcome based on the audience that was targeted. As I am a visual person, this really helped to put the material into perspective.

This is the best module yet out of all of them in this course.

There is a lot of information but I think this one was presented the best.

Yes, interim evaluation is necessary, especially when you have a complex problem and a complex solution that is going to require a large change (or a group of changes) to implement. I like to think of this in this way: if we think back to the first module when we learned about the type of actions we can influence - behavior, policy or marginalization impact - we would not measure any of those using the same type of methodology, nor would we put the same type of time restraints/expectations on seeing that change. Allowing and building in interim evaluations allows you to keep track of all of the type of change you are trying to influence, even when (and if) they are moving at different paces - in addition to allowing you to set up verification steps to ensure that your efforts are being effective and impactful.

The project I am working on is targeted at controlling the free-roaming dog population and reducing associated risks to both animals and people. We started out by establishing a baseline as in the dog population in the country to measure progress against it. The process involved a survey where volunteers were sent out to record any sightings of dogs over 3 days across the country. However, as the pet registration and sterilisation campaign for free-roaming dogs progressed, it outnumbered the baseline population from the initial survey. In this way, interim outcomes by way of updated baselines allowed meaningful interpretation and action going forward. We also drew inspiration from records of dog bite cases in addition to rapid surveys that looked out for puppies which also provided an interim outcome of the success of the earlier campaign phases as the project is already over 2 years.

Seeking help with a clarification on an evaluation tool, specifically the policymaker rating.

SEEKING CLARIFICATION

How is the level of support of policymakers recorded? Would it be correct to understand that an enumerator seeks the
response of the decision-makers to indicate their level of support? Is it the same approach for assessing the degree of influence of decision-makers similarly?

Identity interim outcomes is very important. While doing this, we need to ensure not to confuse outcomes with outputs. Our outcomes have to be in line with the level of change at which we're operating and the target audience

Innitially its paramount to know your status before the final outcome. Conduct prelimnary study so that you can prepare for the final study. The interim will enable you to have insight to prepare ahead for the impact.

Sometimes. Identifying interim outcomes is highly recommended.

Evaluation is important as you are able to track and measure the progress. If you fail to measure, you fail to understand where you are heading.

The interim outcomes measured be the most meaningful, as opposed to the most easily identified, so that the most influential steps are followed and can be traced to later outcomes

Interim outcomes are very essential for track and monitor to project progress.

Interim outcomes are crucial for evaluating advocacy campaigns because they inform the advocacy startegy i.e, what can be improved on.

Measuring interim outcomes is very necessary because it gives an organization realistic insight about their progress, not just optimism.

very necessary for the record.

Yes, it tells you the specifics about who will change and how they will change as well as how they are linked to your tactics and timeframes to determine if you are gaining ground.

Regular evaluation allows you to track your progress toward your goals. Without measurement, it's difficult to know whether you're moving in the right direction or if you've made any improvements. Evaluation helps you identify what's working well and what isn't. This insight is vital for making informed decisions about what to continue, what to modify, and what to discontinue. Measuring progress provides data that can guide decision-making. This data helps you make informed choices based on evidence rather than relying solely on intuition or assumptions.

For me, this session is very interesting because it helps me identify some of the most important outcomes that are used for advocacy.

Interim analysis is good because it alleviates conflict of interest while considering cost, resources, and meaningfulness of the advocacy project (Kumar & Chakraborty, 2016). It also informs the possible elimination or appropriate modification in sample size, study design and an early explanation of the project success. It helps during measurement of the outcomes of interest in a continuum which makes the availability of summarized information and data about the measurements available on time to the various audiences based on the advocacy project (Kumar & Chakraborty, 2016).

References
Kumar, A., & Chakraborty, B. S. (2016). Interim analysis: A rational approach of decision making in clinical trial. Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research, 7(4), 118–122. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-4040.191414

Interim outcomes will enhance strategies being used and will promote the availability of data timely. It will also remove any discrepancies which will lead to success of the advocacy strategy or tactic.

YES IT IS

What seems very important to me is always to be flexible. Yes, it's important to know what to do, also regarding the evaluation of your work, But It's also important not to remain focused on something that's not useful or effective anymore. You ave to be able to shift, to change

yes it is necessary

Identiffying interim outcomes is necessary but not always.

Interim outcomes are essential to understanding the progress you are making.

It’s important for advocacy key players to identify interim outcomes

Definitely, it's not only important for the strategy, but for the people who are avocating. This is a good show of the work that has been done. Also, as political change is not under your control if the final goal doesn't het achive you have other results to highlight.

There is every need to identify and measure interim outcomes. This gives a deeper undersatnding of the project and the overall goal

Identifying outcomes set you on the right part of advocacy.

Diving deep into outcomes, evaluation and tools for collecting data is quite huge for me....it's more on a deeper mode where one has to take time to understand and dwell cause using the wrong tools can be very much time consuming and wasting.
It's like running in circles without getting no where.
Well a saying practice makes perfect,so I believe doing this over time can ignite more vast understanding.
Thanks.

Exactly my take.

Interim outcomes help us to know if our aim is being achieved or not. it can help us know if we need to change our tactics or to continue with our design. Interim outcomes point our direction to either success or failure. interim outcomes tell us add to or subtract from our designs. it gives us a sense of direction to achieving our goals.

Interim outcomes give us a sense of positivity or negativity, wither or not our projects are gaining the required results or not. it tells wither the design needs to be adjusted or forged.

If you don't evaluate interim outcomes you aren't able to accurately gauge your organizations effectiveness and make changes accordingly.

The set of realistic outcomes is it specific, is it direct and logical, or does it gain solid ground. It's important to know how you want to help and be able to advocate.

What is interim? My imagination is a caplet with red colour inside vitamin and mineral and some sugar. It looks like a game changing. I couldn't find it in scrubs. It might be lost somewhere my mistake

Important and necessary

Good interim outcomes in advocacy should demonstrate progress toward the ultimate goal, be measurable, and align with the organization's values. They should also be realistic, relevant to the target audience, and adaptable based on evolving circumstances. Additionally, effective interim outcomes often contribute to building momentum and support for the overall advocacy effort.

Very good

I found that identifying interim outcome is very crucial in advocacy work. Otherwise, the outcome we state could be output level one that could be managed at our organization level but advocacy outcomes need to be high level outcomes that bring about behavior, attitude an practice level changes.

This module was especially interesting, as I had not thought about ways to measure advocacy outcomes other than whether the desired action (i.e. passing a bill) was accomplished. I had not thought about outcomes in terms of the advocacy matrix, which I am finding to be a very helpful tool outside of this course.

Measuring outcomes requires a systematic approach to collect data and assess the changes or impacts resulting from a project or intervention. Here are some steps to consider when measuring outcomes:

Define Clear Outcomes: Start by clearly defining the outcomes you want to measure. Be specific about what changes or impacts you expect to see as a result of the project. Ensure that your outcomes are measurable, realistic, and aligned with your project's goals.

Select Indicators: Identify indicators that will help measure the desired outcomes. Indicators are specific measures that provide evidence of progress or change. Choose indicators that are relevant, reliable, and feasible to measure within the resources and timeframe available. Indicators can be quantitative (e.g., numbers, percentages) or qualitative (e.g., perceptions, stories).

Develop Data Collection Methods: Determine the data collection methods you will use to gather information on the selected indicators. This can include surveys, interviews, focus groups, observations, document reviews, or a combination of methods. Ensure that your data collection methods are appropriate for the outcomes being measured and the target population.

Plan Data Collection: Develop a data collection plan that outlines the steps, timeline, and responsibilities for collecting the data. Consider factors such as sample size, sampling methods, data collection tools, training of data collectors, and ethical considerations. Pilot test your data collection tools to ensure they are clear, reliable, and valid.

Collect Data: Implement your data collection plan and collect the necessary data. Ensure that data collection procedures are followed consistently and that data quality is maintained. Document any challenges or issues encountered during the data collection process.

Analyze Data: Once data collection is complete, analyze the collected data using appropriate statistical or qualitative analysis techniques. This may involve summarizing quantitative data, identifying patterns or themes in qualitative data, and conducting comparisons or correlations.

Interpret Findings: Interpret the findings of your data analysis in relation to the desired outcomes. Determine whether the observed changes or impacts align with the expected outcomes. Consider any contextual factors that may have influenced the outcomes and explore possible explanations for the results.

Communicate Results: Share the findings of your outcome measurement with relevant stakeholders. Prepare clear and concise reports, presentations, or visualizations that effectively communicate the results and their implications. Tailor the communication to the specific needs and interests of different audiences.

Learn and Adapt: Reflect on the findings and use them as an opportunity for learning and adaptation. Consider how the results can inform future decision-making, program improvements, or strategic adjustments. Identify lessons learned and areas for further investigation or action.

It is important to note that measuring outcomes is an iterative process, and it may require ongoing monitoring and evaluation throughout the project lifecycle. Regularly reviewing and updating your measurement approach can help ensure its effectiveness and relevance.

Advocacy evaluation involves assessing the effectiveness, impact, and outcomes of advocacy efforts to determine their success and identify areas for improvement. Here are some key steps and considerations in advocacy evaluation:

Establish Clear Objectives: Clearly define the objectives of your advocacy campaign. These objectives should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART). Having well-defined objectives provides a basis for evaluating the success of your advocacy efforts.

Identify Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): Determine the key indicators that will help you measure progress and outcomes related to your advocacy objectives. KPIs may include policy changes, increased public awareness, behavior change, stakeholder engagement, or media coverage. Select indicators that align with your objectives and can be feasibly measured.

Develop an Evaluation Framework: Create a framework that outlines the evaluation approach, methods, and data sources you will use. Consider incorporating both qualitative and quantitative methods to gather comprehensive data. Determine the evaluation questions you want to answer, such as whether your advocacy strategies were effective, what changes were achieved, and what factors contributed to success or challenges.

Data Collection: Collect data using appropriate methods and tools. Methods may include surveys, interviews, focus groups, document reviews, media monitoring, or observation. Ensure data collection is systematic, consistent, and aligned with your evaluation framework. Consider using a combination of primary data (collected directly by your team) and secondary data (existing data from reputable sources) to enhance the validity and reliability of your findings.

Data Analysis: Analyze the data collected to draw insights and conclusions. Use statistical analysis, content analysis, thematic analysis, or other appropriate techniques depending on the nature of your data. Look for patterns, trends, and correlations to understand the impact of your advocacy efforts. Triangulate data from multiple sources to validate findings and enhance credibility.

Assess Attribution and Contribution: Evaluate the extent to which your advocacy efforts can be attributed to the observed outcomes or changes. Recognize that advocacy is often part of a larger ecosystem of influencing factors, so it may be challenging to isolate the direct impact of advocacy alone. Consider factors such as external events, political context, or other actors' actions that may have influenced the outcomes.

Communicate and Utilize Findings: Prepare a comprehensive evaluation report that presents your findings, including successes, challenges, lessons learned, and recommendations. Tailor the report to different stakeholders, such as funders, coalition partners, organizational leadership, or the broader public. Use the findings to inform future advocacy strategies, refine tactics, and improve the effectiveness of your advocacy efforts.

Continuous Learning and Adaptation: Embrace a culture of continuous learning and adaptation in advocacy. Reflect on the evaluation findings and incorporate them into your ongoing advocacy work. Use feedback loops, monitoring mechanisms, and regular evaluations to track progress and make timely adjustments as needed.

Remember that advocacy evaluation is an iterative process. It is important to evaluate at different stages of your advocacy campaign, such as during planning, implementation, and at key milestones. By systematically evaluating your advocacy efforts, you can assess their impact, identify areas for improvement, and maximize the effectiveness of your advocacy work.

Advocacy can be a powerful tool for driving change and influencing decision-making processes. However, there are potential risks and challenges that advocates should be aware of and address. Here are some common risks associated with advocacy:

Reputational Risks: Engaging in controversial or polarizing advocacy issues may attract public scrutiny or backlash. Critics or opponents may attempt to discredit or undermine the credibility of advocates or their organizations. It is important to anticipate and proactively manage potential reputational risks through strategic communication, transparency, and maintaining ethical standards.

Legal and Regulatory Risks: Advocacy efforts may intersect with legal and regulatory frameworks. Depending on the context, there may be restrictions on certain advocacy activities, such as lobbying, campaigning, or advocacy targeting specific individuals. Advocates need to be aware of and comply with relevant laws and regulations to avoid legal risks.

Funding and Resource Risks: Advocacy initiatives often require financial resources, staff time, and other resources. Securing sustainable funding for advocacy work can be challenging, particularly for long-term campaigns. Overreliance on a single funding source or the sudden withdrawal of funding can jeopardize the continuity and effectiveness of advocacy efforts. Diversifying funding sources and developing contingency plans are essential to mitigate resource risks.

Stakeholder Resistance and Opposition: Advocacy often involves challenging the status quo or vested interests, which can lead to resistance or opposition from individuals, organizations, or institutions. Powerful stakeholders may actively work against advocacy efforts, employing counter-messaging, lobbying, or other tactics to undermine the advocacy campaign. Advocates should anticipate potential opposition and develop strategies to address and mitigate it.

Burnout and Fatigue: Advocacy work can be emotionally demanding and require sustained effort over an extended period. Advocates may face burnout, fatigue, or disillusionment due to the challenges, setbacks, or slow progress. It is important to prioritize self-care, maintain a supportive work environment, and foster resilience among advocates to mitigate the risks of burnout.

Lack of Engagement or Support: Advocacy efforts may struggle to gain traction or generate sufficient public support. Lack of engagement from target audiences, stakeholders, or the broader public can hinder the impact and effectiveness of advocacy initiatives. Creating compelling narratives, engaging diverse stakeholders, and building coalitions can help mitigate the risk of limited engagement or support.

Ineffectiveness or Unintended Consequences: Advocacy strategies and tactics may not always yield the desired outcomes or may have unintended consequences. Factors such as changing political landscapes, complex decision-making processes, or unforeseen external events can influence the effectiveness of advocacy efforts. Regular monitoring, evaluation, and adaptation of strategies are important to address potential ineffectiveness or unintended consequences.

To address these risks, advocates should conduct thorough risk assessments, develop mitigation strategies, and incorporate risk management into their advocacy planning. Building strong relationships with stakeholders, maintaining transparency, and fostering resilience within advocacy organizations can help navigate potential risks and enhance the overall effectiveness of advocacy efforts.

Advocacy can be a powerful tool for driving change and influencing decision-making processes. However, there are potential risks and challenges that advocates should be aware of and address. Here are some common risks associated with advocacy:

Reputational Risks: Engaging in controversial or polarizing advocacy issues may attract public scrutiny or backlash. Critics or opponents may attempt to discredit or undermine the credibility of advocates or their organizations. It is important to anticipate and proactively manage potential reputational risks through strategic communication, transparency, and maintaining ethical standards.

Legal and Regulatory Risks: Advocacy efforts may intersect with legal and regulatory frameworks. Depending on the context, there may be restrictions on certain advocacy activities, such as lobbying, campaigning, or advocacy targeting specific individuals. Advocates need to be aware of and comply with relevant laws and regulations to avoid legal risks.

Funding and Resource Risks: Advocacy initiatives often require financial resources, staff time, and other resources. Securing sustainable funding for advocacy work can be challenging, particularly for long-term campaigns. Overreliance on a single funding source or the sudden withdrawal of funding can jeopardize the continuity and effectiveness of advocacy efforts. Diversifying funding sources and developing contingency plans are essential to mitigate resource risks.

Stakeholder Resistance and Opposition: Advocacy often involves challenging the status quo or vested interests, which can lead to resistance or opposition from individuals, organizations, or institutions. Powerful stakeholders may actively work against advocacy efforts, employing counter-messaging, lobbying, or other tactics to undermine the advocacy campaign. Advocates should anticipate potential opposition and develop strategies to address and mitigate it.

Burnout and Fatigue: Advocacy work can be emotionally demanding and require sustained effort over an extended period. Advocates may face burnout, fatigue, or disillusionment due to the challenges, setbacks, or slow progress. It is important to prioritize self-care, maintain a supportive work environment, and foster resilience among advocates to mitigate the risks of burnout.

Lack of Engagement or Support: Advocacy efforts may struggle to gain traction or generate sufficient public support. Lack of engagement from target audiences, stakeholders, or the broader public can hinder the impact and effectiveness of advocacy initiatives. Creating compelling narratives, engaging diverse stakeholders, and building coalitions can help mitigate the risk of limited engagement or support.

Ineffectiveness or Unintended Consequences: Advocacy strategies and tactics may not always yield the desired outcomes or may have unintended consequences. Factors such as changing political landscapes, complex decision-making processes, or unforeseen external events can influence the effectiveness of advocacy efforts. Regular monitoring, evaluation, and adaptation of strategies are important to address potential ineffectiveness or unintended consequences.

To address these risks, advocates should conduct thorough risk assessments, develop mitigation strategies, and incorporate risk management into their advocacy planning. Building strong relationships with stakeholders, maintaining transparency, and fostering resilience within advocacy organizations can help navigate potential risks and enhance the overall effectiveness of advocacy efforts.

Useful, valuable and necessary

Wow! That was a lot of information! Very informative!

So much useful information in Module 5!

According to what I have learnt, identifying interim outcome, should be at the planning stage but improvement or modification can happen on the way.

The interim outcome are the development out of the improvement on indirect factors

Could you explain further what you mean with "unacceptable scientifically"? And also, advocates are not academics, the tools are not design to be scientifically accurate, but functional to the purposes of advocacy, so... what gives?

Para identificar resultados provisórios para a missão de Asia Russell e da Health GAP, podemos considerar alguns indicadores-chave que refletem o impacto das atividades de advocacy e defesa de direitos em relação ao HIV/AIDS. Aqui estão alguns exemplos de resultados provisórios:

Aumento do acesso a tratamentos antirretrovirais (ARVs):

Indicador: Percentagem de pessoas vivendo com HIV/AIDS que têm acesso a tratamento ARV.
Resultado Provisório: Aumento de X% no número de pessoas que iniciaram o tratamento ARV após a implementação das campanhas de advocacy da Health GAP.
Redução de barreiras de acesso aos medicamentos:

Indicador: Número de políticas ou regulamentações alteradas para reduzir barreiras de acesso aos medicamentos para HIV/AIDS

I think its very relevant in that it gives us an insight into whether we are headed in the direction of our goals. An on route confirmation plan to ensure we are still mission true

I understand that advocates need to always measure outcomes/results of their advocacy efforts.

This is an area where I need to improve a lot. This session made it possible to understand Advocacy Evaluation with the essential information and tools were helpful to start with.

excellent