My Communities

thanks team, I have learned a lot

Setting unrealistic targets in Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) can have detrimental effects on the effectiveness and credibility of programs or projects. Unrealistic targets are those that are unattainable within the given context, resources, and time frame

Unrealistic targets are expectations or project commitment set too high that the project over its duration may not achieve considering the resources and expertise available. Such targets are often the case when the gap analysis during project design phase is poorly conducted.

Unrealistic target are goals that are not attainable, doable or practical. They forced you to work tirelessly for success you desire even if you know they are not achievable

Unrealistic target means: We propose and set the target which is unrealistic, not possible to achieve. For instance: We plan to construct 10 study centers for children which would cost around 50 lakh (5 lakh per center). Actually donor budget in the call for letter is 30 lakh. Before setting the project, we have to see the sources like human, budget, time. In this context, the proposed number of study center is unrealistic...

It is really important to set realistic targets in order to gain faith and trust in the project.

unrealistic targets need touches to enable it to be realistic

An unrealistic target is a goal or objective that is set at a level that is highly improbable or impossible to achieve given the available resources, time, and circumstances. Unrealistic targets are often characterized by being overly ambitious, far beyond what can reasonably be expected, or not grounded in reality.
setting unrealistic targets can lead to a variety of negative outcomes, from demotivation to resource misallocation. To maximize personal and organizational success, it's essential to set goals that are challenging yet attainable and to regularly evaluate and adjust those targets as circumstances change. By doing so, individuals and organizations can achieve greater success and maintain a healthier, more productive environment.

Unrealistic targets can be a double-edged sword. On one hand, they can inspire us to aim higher and push our boundaries. On the other hand, setting targets that are too far from reality can lead to frustration, burnout, and the erosion of trust within a team.

Those targets beyond our budget limit, expertise suggestions and other related issues are called unrealistic targets.

I find it tricky setting ambitious targets that are realistic. The whole of this module is quite unclear to me.

I am M&E specialist for a program which will increase resilience to climate change but the program is 2 months behind schedule, can it affect the target?

i love the unrealistic targets...i have never looked at targets this way

An unrealistic target is one that we cannot achieve in the time mentioned.

I think unrealistic targets happen when people don't understand the project well, lack important data, or feel pressured to set very high goals. These targets can lead to demotivation, poor performance, and resource strain.
To address this, organizations should engage in comprehensive planning, ground targets in data and realistic assessments, use data and involve everyone who's affected, and aim for goals that are challenging but doable. That way, you can manage the project well and achieve what you set out to do.

I don't have anything to add to this discussion

This might be a waste of time as setting targets to meet results

Unrealistic targets can hinder project success by either setting expectations too high or too low based on emotions rather than data. When targets are overly optimistic, they may lead to disappointment and resource misallocation, as evidenced when setting goals beyond available data or resources. Conversely, excessively cautious targets born from pessimism can stifle progress and overlook potential improvements, as seen in the reluctance to set ambitious goals based on historical trends. Striking a balance by using data, considering available resources, and remaining flexible to adjust targets when necessary is key to achieving realistic and effective project outcomes.

Unrealistic targets are a threat to project success and good results. Therefore, it’s important to set realistic targets by looking at what’s achievable, what can be measured, and what’s within the project period, that way, targets can be highly achieved.

in every organization the are targets which are set to rate the performance or project improvement

setting targets may sometimes be tricky but it is risk taking

It is well informative

The targets need to be ambitious but realistic. This is so because you might end up having a target that you can not achieve at the end of the project. Rather, one needs to align with all available resources and consulting all required sources to come up with targets.

Having realistic targets is a tricky part of the MERL process, but alos a great way to better understand what is achievable. Looking at what is already happening on the ground in terms of improvement of the problem is essential, otherwise it is difficult to attribute the changes happening to your intervention.

You must give attention your target which is ambitious and also realistic. If your target is unrealistic, everyone involved will end up disappointed: yourself, your team, and your donors.

Unrealistic targets are those targets that cannot be achieved due to one reason or the other. For example, in the organization for which I used to work, increasing the number of patients in a hospital seen in a day, week, month etc, is not achievable. Reason being, you cannot control who fall sick or not and you cannot control those who would choose your health facility when they are sick

Setting an ambitious and realistic target attract donors to your project.

Unrealistic targets can have a number of negative consequences for projects.

They can discourage team members. If team members know that they are unlikely to be able to achieve the targets that have been set, they may become discouraged and lose motivation.
They can lead to poor quality work. Team members may feel pressured to cut corners in order to meet unrealistic targets, which can lead to poor quality work.
They can damage the reputation of the project. If a project does not meet its targets, it can damage the reputation of the project and the organization that is implementing it.
They can waste resources. If a project is focused on meeting unrealistic targets, it may waste resources that could be better used elsewhere.
It is important to avoid setting unrealistic targets for projects. By setting ambitious but realistic targets, project teams can be more motivated and successful.

Here are some tips for avoiding unrealistic targets:

Do your research. Make sure that you have a good understanding of the baseline level of your indicators, historical trends, and other relevant factors before you set your targets.
Be realistic about your resources. Consider your budget, staffing, and other resources when setting your targets.
Get feedback from others. Talk to your team members, stakeholders, and other experts to get their input on your targets.
Be flexible. Be prepared to adjust your targets as needed, based on changes in the project or environment.
By following these tips, you can set realistic targets for your projects that will help you to achieve your goals.

Targets shouldn't be way less or more that reasonable, and the following points below can help the organization avoid setting unrealistic targets;
Referring to the previous projects before setting targets for the new targets, with this an organization is able borrow knowledge from the previous targets and know whether it way to high to be achieved or to less to be realistic.
Referring to other organizations targets who have ventured in the same kind of project. This can help guide the organization to set realistic targets by acting as a point of reference especially if it is its first time to venture into this kind of project.
Referring to the your organization's budget, this can help the organization avoid making targets way high beyond what it can afford and way less and yet it could make more meaningful impact if initially planned well.
All the three ways listed above can help guide an organization minimize the risk of setting unrealistic targets.

Starting implementation of project with the unrealistic targets make project management unrealistic. Maximum times in the developing countries, Donor does not accept that kind of proposal where targets are not align with the budget. If somehow it starts, after several visit of donor organization in the project implemented site, they will shout it down. Sometimes, M and E officer arises questions in the first phase of the project to adjust the targets if he/they finds something unrealistic.

Since we know that our Donors and Stakeholders are interested in great results, we might want to impress them by setting high targets. Also being optimistic and confident, we might set our targets too high. That can affect the results according to the targets you would like to reach. So it's important, when setting our targets, to think about the realistic part to be able to achieve our goals.

Targets should be carefully set. Too much optimism can led to setting high targets and feeling too much pessimism can lead to setting low targets . Therefore do not let your feelings set your targets rather we should use data to set realistic targets.
Unrealistic targets are set as a result of poor judgment in foreseeing how your targets will be accomplished. Hence, when we set targets that can be ambitious but realistic.

Unrealistic targets are targets that exceed the set budget for the overall project.

Unrealistic targets are targets that are not achievable, doable, or practical. Generally, these targets set higher standards than the individual or team can reach.

Setting realistic targets is crucial for the success and effectiveness of any project or initiative. Unrealistic targets can lead to a range of problems and challenges, including frustration, demotivation, resource misallocation, and ultimately, failure to achieve the intended goals. Here are some key points to consider in the discussion of unrealistic targets:

Definition of Unrealistic Targets: It's essential to define what constitutes unrealistic targets for a particular project. This can vary depending on factors such as the project's scope, available resources, timeline, and external influences.

In conclusion, setting realistic targets is essential for the success of any endeavor. Unrealistic targets can have detrimental effects on motivation, resource allocation, and overall project outcomes. Finding the right balance between ambition and realism is crucial for achieving long-term success.

In the realm of Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E), setting unrealistic targets can pose significant risks to the effectiveness of a program or project. Unrealistic targets often lead to inaccurate data and reporting, making it difficult to assess true progress and impact. To mitigate this risk, it's crucial to adopt a risk-based approach to target setting. This involves a careful assessment of potential risks and challenges that may affect the achievement of targets. By identifying these risks upfront, M&E professionals can tailor their targets to be both challenging and achievable. This approach ensures a more accurate reflection of a project's performance and helps avoid the pitfalls of setting targets that are either too ambitious or too easily attainable, enabling more meaningful and informed decision-making throughout the project lifecycle.

Unrealistic targets are targets that are too difficult to achieve or are not based on sound evidence. This can lead to a lack of trust in the monitoring and evaluation process, resulting in a lack of commitment from stakeholders and a feeling of frustration.

1. Unrealistic Timeframes: Setting unrealistic time frames for data collection and analysis can lead to rushed and inaccurate results. This can lead to unrealistic targets that may be difficult to reach.

2. Unrealistic Expectations: Setting unrealistic expectations for the results of a monitoring and evaluation process can lead to unrealistic targets. This can be due to a lack of understanding of the data or a lack of knowledge of the context.

3. Unrealistic Goals: Setting unrealistic goals can lead to unrealistic targets. This is because it may not be possible to achieve the desired outcomes in the given timeframe or resources.

4. Lack of Evidence: Setting targets without sufficient evidence or data can lead to unrealistic targets. This is because the data may be incomplete, out of date, or not applicable to the current situation.

5. Unclear Targets: Setting unclear targets can lead to unrealistic targets. This is because it can be difficult to measure progress or success without clear goals in mind.

In conclusion, unrealistic targets can lead to a lack of trust in the monitoring and evaluation process and a feeling of frustration from stakeholders. To prevent this, it is important to ensure that realistic targets are set based on evidence and clear goals.

Thank you for highlighting the importance of risk-based target setting in Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E). Your advice is invaluable for ensuring that targets are realistic and achievable, thereby providing a more accurate assessment of progress and impact. I look forward to applying this approach in my future M&E projects.

A good target will conduce to good évaluation.

Unrealistic targets refer to goals, objectives, or expectations that are not achievable within a reasonable or practical context. These targets are often set without taking into account the available resources, time, or constraints, and they are not based on a realistic assessment of the situation. Unrealistic targets can lead to various negative consequences, both in personal and professional contexts. Here are some common issues associated with unrealistic targets:

Frustration and Stress: When individuals or organizations set targets that are impossible to reach, it can lead to frustration and stress among those responsible for achieving them. This can harm mental and physical well-being.

Demotivation: Unrealistic targets can demotivate individuals and teams. When people realize that they have little chance of meeting their goals, they may become disengaged or apathetic.

Poor Decision-Making: Pursuing unrealistic targets can lead to poor decision-making, as people might resort to unethical or risky actions in an attempt to meet their goals.

Wasted Resources: When resources are allocated to achieving unattainable targets, it results in a waste of time, money, and energy that could be better used elsewhere.

Damage to Reputation: Setting unrealistic targets and failing to achieve them can damage an individual's or organization's reputation. Stakeholders may lose trust and confidence.

Burnout: Constantly striving for unattainable targets can lead to burnout, where individuals become physically and emotionally exhausted.

Inefficiency: Unrealistic targets can result in inefficient use of resources, as people may focus on the wrong priorities or engage in activities that do not contribute to the overall goals.

Unrealistic targets refer to goals, objectives, or expectations that are not achievable within a reasonable or practical context. These targets are often set without taking into account the available resources, time, or constraints, and they are not based on a realistic assessment of the situation. Unrealistic targets can lead to various negative consequences, both in personal and professional contexts. Here are some common issues associated with unrealistic targets:

Frustration and Stress: When individuals or organizations set targets that are impossible to reach, it can lead to frustration and stress among those responsible for achieving them. This can harm mental and physical well-being.

Demotivation: Unrealistic targets can demotivate individuals and teams. When people realize that they have little chance of meeting their goals, they may become disengaged or apathetic.

Poor Decision-Making: Pursuing unrealistic targets can lead to poor decision-making, as people might resort to unethical or risky actions in an attempt to meet their goals.

Wasted Resources: When resources are allocated to achieving unattainable targets, it results in a waste of time, money, and energy that could be better used elsewhere.

Damage to Reputation: Setting unrealistic targets and failing to achieve them can damage an individual's or organization's reputation. Stakeholders may lose trust and confidence.

Burnout: Constantly striving for unattainable targets can lead to burnout, where individuals become physically and emotionally exhausted.

Inefficiency: Unrealistic targets can result in inefficient use of resources, as people may focus on the wrong priorities or engage in activities that do not contribute to the overall goals.

Unrealistic targets refer to goals, objectives, or expectations that are not achievable within a reasonable or practical context. These targets are often set without taking into account the available resources, time, or constraints, and they are not based on a realistic assessment of the situation. Unrealistic targets can lead to various negative consequences, both in personal and professional contexts. Here are some common issues associated with unrealistic targets:

Frustration and Stress: When individuals or organizations set targets that are impossible to reach, it can lead to frustration and stress among those responsible for achieving them. This can harm mental and physical well-being.

Demotivation: Unrealistic targets can demotivate individuals and teams. When people realize that they have little chance of meeting their goals, they may become disengaged or apathetic.

Poor Decision-Making: Pursuing unrealistic targets can lead to poor decision-making, as people might resort to unethical or risky actions in an attempt to meet their goals.

Wasted Resources: When resources are allocated to achieving unattainable targets, it results in a waste of time, money, and energy that could be better used elsewhere.

Damage to Reputation: Setting unrealistic targets and failing to achieve them can damage an individual's or organization's reputation. Stakeholders may lose trust and confidence.

Burnout: Constantly striving for unattainable targets can lead to burnout, where individuals become physically and emotionally exhausted.

Inefficiency: Unrealistic targets can result in inefficient use of resources, as people may focus on the wrong priorities or engage in activities that do not contribute to the overall goals.

Unrealistic targets in projects are goals or objectives that are not achievable within the given constraints of the project, including time, resources, and scope. Setting unrealistic targets can lead to project failure, increased stress among team members, and a waste of resources. Some common examples of unrealistic targets in projects include:

Unrealistic targets could happen from lack of adequate information at your disposal or setting targets that's not possible to achieve

Being ambitious is good but if your being ambitious could make you set targets that is not achievable makes your ambition a bad one .
You should always thrive to set a realistic and achievable target, rather than trying to be over ambitious and you set a target that is not easy to achieve. This could affect your credibility before your donor

Unrealistic targets may result from unrealistic assumptions and possible biases. It is important to check the feasibility of every set target, from availability of resources, time e t c.
It is important to do a feasibility check while setting targets

Unrealistic targets are dangerous in project management because they can lead to financial and material disaster. That is why it's important to master the selection criteria before choosing your targets. The targets must be SMART Specific, Measurable, Accountable, Realistic and Timetable.

Unrealistic targets are goals that are not attainable,doable or practical. This targets are set by teams or individual with Unrealistic expectations of their abilities and potential, this can be set overly ambitious, Unrealistic targets and frequently impossible to meet.when this Unrealistic targets are set,you can get bored and quit early.unrealistic targets are impossible to reach ,or at least very unlikely to be achieved, this can take your motivation and passion.

Hello everyone

The challenge of having unrealistic targets entails disappointments, frustrations, low ranking in the appraisal and low morale amongst the implementers especially those charged with day to day running of the project. It is prudent that the targets are realistic and attainable.

An unrealistic target, often referred to as an unrealistic goal or objective, is one that is highly unlikely or impossible to achieve within a given context or timeframe. These targets are often set without a realistic understanding of the resources, time, or effort required to attain them, and they may not be based on a rational assessment of the situation. Unrealistic targets can lead to frustration, disappointment, and a waste of resources.

For example, if a small startup company sets a goal to become the world's largest tech company within a year, that would generally be considered an unrealistic target. Likewise, an individual aiming to become a professional athlete in a sport they have never trained for and are not genetically predisposed for in a short period of time would also be pursuing an unrealistic target.

In business and personal life, it's important to set goals that are challenging but attainable, taking into account the available resources and constraints. Unrealistic targets can demotivate individuals or teams and hinder progress, whereas realistic goals can inspire and guide efforts effectively.

Monitoring is the systematic and routine collection of information from projects and programmes for four main purposes:

To learn from experiences to improve practices and activities in the future;
To have internal and external accountability of the resources used and the results obtained;
To take informed decisions on the future of the initiative;
To promote empowerment of beneficiaries of the initiative.
Monitoring is a periodically recurring task already beginning in the planning stage of a project or programme. Monitoring allows results, processes and experiences to be documented and used as a basis to steer decision-making and learning processes. Monitoring is checking progress against plans. The data acquired through monitoring is used for evaluation.

Evaluation is assessing, as systematically and objectively as possible, a completed project or programme (or a phase of an ongoing project or programme that has been completed). Evaluations appraise data and information that inform strategic decisions, thus improving the project or programme in the future.

Evaluations should help to draw conclusions about five main aspects of the intervention:

relevance
effectiveness
efficiency
impact
sustainability
Information gathered in relation to these aspects during the monitoring process provides the basis for the evaluative analysis.

Monitoring & Evaluation
M&E is an embedded concept and constitutive part of every project or programme design (“must be”). M&E is not an imposed control instrument by the donor or an optional accessory (“nice to have”) of any project or programme. M&E is ideally understood as dialogue on development and its progress between all stakeholders.

In general, monitoring is integral to evaluation. During an evaluation, information from previous monitoring processes is used to understand the ways in which the project or programme developed and stimulated change. Monitoring focuses on the measurement of the following aspects of an intervention:

On quantity and quality of the implemented activities (outputs: What do we do? How do we manage our activities?)
On processes inherent to a project or programme (outcomes: What were the effects /changes that occurred as a result of your intervention?)
On processes external to an intervention (impact: Which broader, long-term effects were triggered by the implemented activities in combination with other environmental factors?)
The evaluation process is an analysis or interpretation of the collected data which delves deeper into the relationships between the results of the project/programme, the effects produced by the project/programme and the overall impact of the project/programme.

Overly Ambitious Timeframes: Setting a project completion date that is significantly shorter than what is realistically achievable given the scope and resources available.

Aiming for 100% customer satisfaction, which may not be achievable due to varying customer expectations and needs.

these are targets that are huge and fail to meet expectation of the M and E strategy

Which criteria can help me set up realistic target?

Unrealistic targets can be detrimental to any project. It is important to know your teams capacity, time capacity, financial capacity among other aspects. Unrealistic targets will most time hit below that target and serve as a demotivating factor to the team members involved and probably transfer the same attitude to other parallel projects. The outcome is a demotivated team, hitting low targets and eventual death of the project all together.

Start with the end in mind. What do you want to achieve, e.g. in a project seeking to reduce the amount of litter in an area, you can say; install 10 bins in area XYZ in 2 months. Then you work back, how to source them, from where, by whom, etc

It is very important to set realistic targets and posible to adjust targets.
I will like to know at what point can targets be adjusted, is it before the commencement of project, middle of project or at any point of project implementation?
Thanks

Unrealistic targets refer to goals or objectives that are set at a level that is highly unlikely or impossible to achieve given the available resources, time frame, or circumstances. When it comes to Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) duties, unrealistic targets can have several negative effects:

1. Loss of Credibility: Setting targets that are clearly unattainable can erode the credibility of the project or program. Stakeholders may become skeptical about the validity and effectiveness of the M&E process.

2. Demotivation of Stakeholders: Unrealistic targets can demotivate individuals and teams working towards achieving them. When people feel that their efforts are unlikely to lead to success, they may become disengaged or demoralized.

3. Misallocation of Resources: Resources may be misallocated if they are directed towards achieving targets that are fundamentally unattainable. This can lead to inefficiencies and wasted resources.

4. Undermining Trust in the M&E Process: Unrealistic targets may lead stakeholders to question the reliability and integrity of the M&E process. They may start to view it as a checkbox exercise rather than a genuine tool for assessing progress and making informed decisions.

5. Inaccurate Assessment of Progress: If targets are unrealistic, the M&E process may inaccurately suggest that progress is being made when it is not. This can lead to a false sense of achievement and hinder the identification of necessary adjustments.

6. Difficulty in Learning from Results: Unrealistic targets can make it harder to extract meaningful lessons from the evaluation process. If targets are not aligned with what is actually achievable, it becomes challenging to identify areas for improvement and best practices.

To mitigate these effects, it's crucial to set targets that are SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) and grounded in a realistic understanding of the context and available resources. Regular review and adjustment of targets may also be necessary as circumstances change. This ensures that the M&E process remains a valuable tool for informed decision-making and continuous improvement.

setting unrealistic targets can be very common in our day to day life.
this can be seen where people set targets based on their age. for example, some one can say that by the time i an 24 years i should have built a house, bought a car etc. this can be unrealistic because by this age, some people are just starting their careers therefore the financial resources are limited. this can be an example of an unrealistic targets in our day to day lifes.

setting unrealistic targets can be very common in our day to day life.
this can be seen where people set targets based on their age. for example, some one can say that by the time i an 24 years i should have built a house, bought a car etc. this can be unrealistic because by this age, some people are just starting their careers therefore the financial resources are limited. this can be an example of an unrealistic targets in our day to day lifes.

Unrealistic targets are those that are too ambiguous and cannot be achieved. Unrealistic targets are not based on any data rather they are based on feelings. Sometimes we are too optimistic about our targets without reconsider about the historical data in previous projects or situation. Thus, will affect to unspecific targets and outcomes.

If we want to handle this biases, we have to gather information as much as we can to decide the realistic and reliable targets. I strongly believe it can reduce unrealistic data we might create.

Creating data collection tools needs consideration about details information we want to collect, our targets or participants background, and other factors such as budget, and access.

Unrealistic targets would include reaching bigger numbers as opposed to project reach and available resources.

Unrealistic targets are a challenging part of project management. There are a number of factors that lead to unrealistic targets: lack of careful planning, inaccurate estimation of costs, resources, and time required, and ineffective communication between all the participants involved in the project.

Unrealistic targets are a challenging part of project management. There are a number of factors that lead to unrealistic targets: lack of careful planning, inaccurate estimation of costs, resources and time required; ineffective communication between all the participants involved in the project.

Total agree with you

Setting a target is very important. Sometime the distinguishing between a target and a indicator is confusing. I am happy to have learned the thin line that separates the two.

Setting a target is very important. Sometime the distinguishing between a target and a indicator is confusing. I am happy to have learned the thin line that separates the two.

Unrealistic targets often lead to failure

Unrealistic targets could at the later end up getting everyone in the team disappointed due to the fact that they are targets that the likelihood of missing is very high

I struggle to find realistic targets for my projects. What happens when I insert wrong target?

Setting realistic targets in Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) is important for effective project management and impact assessment. Realistic targets provide a clear basis for accountability, ensuring that project stakeholders are held responsible for achieving specific, attainable outcomes. They enable efficient resource allocation, motivate project teams, and enhance an organization's credibility. With achievable targets, organizations can focus on quality rather than arbitrary numbers, fostering a culture of learning and adaptation that is crucial for long-term success.

Failing to establish realistic targets can lead to demotivation, resource misallocation, and inefficiency. It can also damage an organization's credibility and public trust. Unrealistic targets may hinder the learning process and prevent organizations from making informed adjustments to their strategies. Furthermore, when projects consistently fall short of unattainable targets, the long-term impact and sustainability of those projects can be compromised, negatively affecting the communities they aim to serve.

the program was amazing and helpful and we learn LOTS OF KNOWLEDGE from it Including Monitoring and evaluation and planing for evaluation or data collection and data analysis

They set you up for inventible failure due to lack of prior research on baseline data, trends and previous similar projects.

Demotivation. Among the unrealistic target may demotivate student to reach goals seem unattainable it can lead to failure.
Negative impact on student. Unrealistic target is all about the unattainable of students attandence in school.

setting unrealistic targets can be very common in our day to day life.
this can be seen where people set targets based on their age. for example, some one can say that by the time i an 24 years i should have built a house, bought a car etc. this can be unrealistic because by this age, some people are just starting their careers therefore the financial resources are limited. this can be an example of an unrealistic targets in our day to day lifes.

Targets are most often another focus to look at when implementing a project. Without targets, an organization may not be able to know exactly what to achieve or what to drive their goals towards. Its important that targets are set.

Setting unrealistic goals can have the short and long term effects in an organization such as
• Missed deadlines as a result of the teams spending longer times to achieve set milestones. The teams’ end up being demoralized due to the inability to assess progress towards achieving the set milestones.
• The work quality of teams degrades as they are more likely to finalize tasks hurriedly and move to the subsequent tasks in efforts to bit the set deadlines.
• Decreased morale among teams as they give up to the pressure of trying to attain unfeasible milestones.
• High employee turn- over as individuals might feel as though their career has stagnated, leading them to quit an organization and search for better opportunities.
• Increased costs due to high employee turn –over as the remaining p teams take on
on more tasks leading to substandard work. An organization may not only lose revenue due to substandard work, it will also be forced to hire more employees.

unrealistic targets are goals that are not achievable, doable or pratical, these goals set higher standards than the individual or team can reach. they can be expensive an time consuming, leading to feelings of frustration despair when the failure occurs.

• In my opinion, unrealistic targets are one the of the most disappointing and Impediments to the work-progress. It originate from setting numbers without any fromer data as we learned in this module, it might be both optimistic or pessimistic targets, however, both targets are not the best way to start your project based on.

Setting an extremely short timeline for completing a complex project that requires significant time and resources.
Establishing goals that are beyond the available budget or resources.
Setting targets that are not based on accurate data or analysis, leading to unrealistic expectations.
Defining goals that are not aligned with the capabilities or expertise of the individuals or teams involved in the project.

Setting unrealistic goals can lead to failure, be it de motivstion,stress,burnout,depression.This is due to the frustration of inability to meet desired results. As a result, setting unrealistic goals can cause missed deadlines, reduced quality of work, and the overall demoralisation of employees satisfactions..it is helpful to consider diffrent scenarios previous,future and fall in between the two

Setting an extremely short timeline for completing a complex project that requires significant time and resources.
Establishing goals that are beyond the available budget or resources.
Setting targets that are not based on accurate data or analysis, leading to unrealistic expectations.
Defining goals that are not aligned with the capabilities or expertise of the individuals or teams involved in the project.

Setting unrealistic goals can lead to many undesirable results such as ,stress,demotivation, depression and burnout .Due to the inability to meet desired results. As a result, setting unrealistic goals can cause missed deadlines, reduced quality of work, and the overall demoralization of employees. Using scenario plan can play a major role in assisting to set measurable indicators that are clear and achievable. looking at what happened in the past what is happening and focasting what could happen in the future by using data, historic data.

Les objectifs irréalistes sont ceux ne sont pas possible à atteindre soit par manque de financement,de temps ou tout autre raison qui peut advenir lors du du projet .

Les objectifs irréalistes sont ceux ne sont pas possible à atteindre soit par manque de financement,de temps ou tout autre raison qui peut advenir lors du du projet .

Setting unrealistic targets can be detrimental to the integrity of the organization as it can give the donor a sense of unseriousness and lead to unnecessary disappointment.

Unrealistic targets are such targets that cannot be achievable or gain result.

unrealistic targets center around wishes or hopes rather than what is achievable, these goals are not attainable, doable or practical, they sound promising, you can barely achieve them due to a lack of resources, and those are too ambicious and cannot achieved.

A target is unrealistic when it cannot be achieved or gain result

A target is unrealistic when it cannot be achieved or gain result

Targets may be unrealistic when they are not underpinned by any baseline, expert opinion, or local context on any contextual data. It is helpful to set targets based on data evidence. This way, it is scientific and can be properly and adequately monitored and measured.

Unrealistic targets in Monitoring and Evaluation can lead to inaccurate assessments, skewed data, and compromised decision-making. It's essential to set achievable and meaningful goals for effective evaluation.

Unrealistic Target are levels that a project envision to meet which is not possible. This could either be due to funding, unknown project previous target.

Unrealistic targets in the context of program design can be detrimental to the overall success and sustainability of an initiative. Setting targets that are too ambitious or unattainable may lead to frustration, loss of credibility, and the potential failure of the program. Here are some potential issues associated with unrealistic targets:

1. Demotivation and Frustration:
   Setting overly ambitious targets may demoralize program implementers and participants if the goals seem unattainable. This can lead to a lack of motivation, reduced effort, and even resentment.
2. Loss of Credibility:
   Unrealistic targets can erode the credibility of the program, both among participants and stakeholders. When promised outcomes are not achieved, trust in the program's effectiveness may be compromised.
3. Resource Allocation Challenges:
   Unrealistic targets may lead to misallocation of resources, as program planners may invest too much in certain areas without achieving proportional results. This can result in inefficient use of time, money, and manpower.
4. Program Discontinuation:
   Persistent failure to meet unrealistic targets may lead to the discontinuation of the program, as funders and stakeholders may lose confidence in its ability to deliver meaningful outcomes.
5. Unintended Consequences:
   Pressuring participants to meet unattainable targets might lead to unintended consequences, such as dishonest reporting, manipulation of data, or neglect of other important aspects of the program.
6. Impact on Program Participants:
   Unrealistic targets can place undue stress on program participants, especially if the expectations are set at levels that are beyond their control. This can negatively impact their mental well-being and overall experience with the program.To avoid these pitfalls, it's essential to set targets that are challenging yet achievable, based on a realistic understanding of the context, resources available, and the capacity of the target population. Regular assessments, feedback mechanisms, and a willingness to adjust targets based on evolving circumstances can contribute to a more adaptive and successful program. When designing a program, it's important to balance ambition with pragmatism, ensuring that goals align with the program's objectives, resources, and the specific needs of the community. Regular monitoring and evaluation can help identify early signs of unrealistic targets and allow for timely adjustments to enhance the program's effectiveness.

Some categories of Unrealistic Targets such as- Target not set according to the fund, target working area set where geographical and communication barrier exists

Unrealistic targets are goals or objectives that are overly ambitious, impractical, or unattainable within the given constraints, resources, or timeframes. Setting unrealistic targets can have negative consequences for individuals, teams, or organizations.

i think this discussion is perfect

I am really excited to learn M&E from this platform, keep up the good work

Yes- Overly ambitious.