My Communities

Honor the dignity, well-being, and self-worth of individuals. Do not, intentionally or unintentionally, cause physical, emotional or reputational damage to the people affected by your work.

Honor the dignity, well-being, and self-worth of individuals. Do not, intentionally or unintentionally, cause physical, emotional or reputational damage to the people affected by your work.

Honor the dignity, well-being, and self-worth of individuals. Do not, intentionally or unintentionally, cause physical, emotional or reputational damage to the people affected by your work.

learned that Ethics have an important role in guiding standards of behaviour with our respondents, our partners and the wider society, and can help respond to the question: are we doing what is right?

Honor the dignity, well-being, and self-worth of individuals. Do not, intentionally or unintentionally, cause physical, emotional or reputational damage to the people affected by your work.

In ensuring that monitoring and evaluation (M&E) practices cause no harm, ethical principles must guide every step of data collection. First, the experience of participants should be prioritized: data collection processes should be simple, intuitive, and efficient, minimizing stress and confusion. This can be achieved by designing user-friendly interfaces and clear instructions. Second, obtaining informed consent is crucial to respect participants' autonomy and protect them from risks they might not fully understand. This is particularly vital when working with vulnerable groups or in sensitive research areas. Third, maintaining the anonymity and confidentiality of participant data safeguards against potential harms such as reputational damage or safety risks. Strong data protection measures should be implemented to honor these commitments. Lastly, identifying and mitigating potential biases and inequities in data collection and reporting is essential. This involves critically assessing how data could be misinterpreted or misused to harm certain groups and ensuring that findings are presented accurately and responsibly.

Honor the dignity, well-being, and self-worth of individuals. Do not, intentionally or unintentionally, cause physical, emotional or reputational damage to the people affected by your work.

Ethical Data Collection Practices in Organizations: Ensuring 'Do No Harm' to Stakeholders

Of course! The data might be correct, however, the release of this data might not be well-taken by politicans and other mid or higher status people, as they have a prejudice against these study groups (low status). So, they might device to systematically attack the benefits and rights of all low status people by taking this data as proof of their pre-defined perceptions

Certainly! Let's delve into the ethical considerations raised by this scenario.

1. Sampling Bias and Representativeness:

   • The choice of survey location outside an expensive grocery store introduces sampling bias. By targeting women leaving this specific store, the data collected may not accurately represent the broader population.
   • Economically well-off individuals are more likely to shop at expensive stores. Thus, the survey results may disproportionately reflect the views of wealthier women.
   • To address this, the partner organization should diversify the survey locations to include a broader cross-section of the community. This would improve the representativeness of the data.

2. Ethnic Homogeneity:

   • The observation that most participants belong to a single ethnic group raises concerns about ethnic bias.
   • If the survey only captures the perspectives of one ethnic group, it may not reflect the experiences and opinions of other ethnicities.
   • To mitigate this, the partner organization should intentionally seek out diverse locations and engage with women from various ethnic backgrounds.

3. Perceptions of Gender Equity:

   • The survey question itself—"Women have worse job opportunities than men"—may oversimplify a complex issue.
   • Job opportunities can vary significantly based on factors like education, industry, and location. A binary agree/disagree response may not capture the nuances.
   • Consider refining the question or adding follow-up questions to explore participants' reasoning and experiences in more depth.

4. Transparency and Informed Consent:

   • Participants should be informed about the purpose of the survey, how their data will be used, and their right to decline participation.
   • Transparency ensures ethical conduct and builds trust with respondents.
   • The partner organization should clearly communicate these details to participants.

5. Contextual Factors:

   • Consider the context in which the survey is conducted. Are women leaving the grocery store in a hurry? Are they comfortable discussing sensitive topics?
   • Sensitivity to participants' feelings and privacy is crucial. Researchers should approach potential respondents with empathy and respect.

In summary, ethical research practices require careful consideration of sampling methods, transparency, and cultural sensitivity. By addressing these concerns, your team can ensure a more robust and meaningful exploration of gender equity attitudes.