Please update your browser

We have detected that you are using an outdated browser that will prevent you from using
certain features. An update is required to improve your browsing experience.

Use the links below to upgrade your existing browser

Hello, visitor.

Register Now

  • this is a vital point, however can be negated if it is understood that representation from all stakeholders has to be a conscious effort and intent of the theory of change program design

  • A theory of change would not be complete without an articulation of the assumptions that stakeholders use to explain the change process they have envisioned. Assumptions explain both the connections between the preconditions for long-term change that occur in the early and intermediate stages of the change process, and the expectations about how and why proposed interventions will bring them about. This concept is so important because it shows how it is so important to work hand in hands and emphasize to the view of stakeholders, it show how it is inclusive approach each and everyone concerned would be important to be in the process of designing the theory of change.

  • Indicators tell the story of how success will be recognized at each step in the pathway of change.
    Its important because; we define an indicator for each outcome (or precondition) on the pathway of change not just for the long-term goal.

  • "An implementation plan based on faulty assumptions is not likely to bring about the desired goal"
    It is prudent to critically identify assumptions that your program will operate on. This may lead to a program not achieving it's overal objective

  • A theory of change is essentially an
    explanation of how a group of stakeholders
    expects to reach a commonly understood
    long-term goal.

  • Theory of change would not be complete without an articulation of the assumptions that stakeholders use to explain the change process they have envisioned. For example, one group we worked with developed a theory largely based on the principles of resident control and empowerment.

  • Difficult task of identifying indicators and making them fully operational in the TOC process

  • Sentence: "Identifying indicators and making them fully operational is often the most difficult task in the theory of change process."

    This sentence is useful to me because it prepares me in advance as to the level of intensity of the work ahead. I think it's easy to fall into the trap of thinking that constructing a ToC will be an easy process. Knowing ahead of time that this can be the most difficult area will help me to better prepare for this task.

  • Indicators are ways to operationalize outcomes.

  • Deciding which subset of outcomes the group
    can and/or will attempt to do something about
    requires a group discussion and, sometimes,
    a bit of a reality check.

  • The target population are the women with unplanned or unwanted pregnancy. The service population are the male who impregnate them and there social networks which includes friends, family members neighbors, clandestine health practitioners.

  • The Theory of Change is a comprehensive framework used to plan, implement, and evaluate social change initiatives. Below are the steps involved in developing a Theory of Change:

    Clarify the Vision and Goals: Begin by clearly defining the long-term vision and overarching goals of the initiative. What is the desired social change you aim to achieve? This sets the direction for the entire process.
    
    Identify Key Stakeholders: Determine who the key stakeholders are—those who will be involved in or affected by the initiative. This includes beneficiaries, partners, funders, policymakers, and other relevant actors.
    
    Map Outcomes: Identify the intermediate outcomes or changes that need to occur to achieve the long-term goals. These outcomes should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART).
    
    Develop a Logic Model: Create a visual representation or logic model that illustrates the causal pathway between the activities, outputs, outcomes, and impacts of the initiative. This helps to articulate the assumptions underlying the theory of change.
    
    Identify Interventions and Activities: Determine the specific interventions or activities that will be implemented to bring about the desired outcomes. These may include capacity-building workshops, advocacy campaigns, community outreach programs, etc.
    
    Define Indicators: Identify indicators to measure progress and success at each stage of the theory of change. Indicators should be aligned with the outcomes and goals and should be both quantitative and qualitative.
    
    Assess Risks and Assumptions: Identify potential risks and assumptions associated with the theory of change. This involves considering external factors, such as political, economic, social, and environmental influences, that may impact the initiative's success.
    
    Develop a Monitoring and Evaluation Plan: Create a plan for systematically monitoring and evaluating the progress and effectiveness of the initiative. This involves collecting data on indicators, tracking outcomes, and assessing the overall impact of the intervention.
    
    Iterate and Adapt: Review and refine the theory of change based on ongoing monitoring and evaluation data, feedback from stakeholders, and changes in the external context. Be prepared to adapt strategies and activities as needed to maximize effectiveness.
    
    Communicate and Learn: Communicate the theory of change to stakeholders and partners to ensure shared understanding and buy-in. Foster a culture of learning and reflection within the organization or initiative, and share lessons learned with the broader community.
    

    By following these steps, organizations and initiatives can develop a robust Theory of Change that guides their efforts toward meaningful social impact.

Reply to Topic

Looks like your connection to PhilanthropyU was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.