My Communities

I'm agree with you

I agree with my colleagues about involving the stakeholders , and just to expand on that involving the community comes at hand. Grass root level approach is as well crucial because they are victims and when NGOs fail to involve them then they feel used which leads the NGO not to succeed.

Very true, I agree with you on that.

The contextualisation and pre-emptive consideration of political environment allows for policy makers and pressure groups to push forward agenda relating to developmental and non-developmental issues. However, what is important to note, is that even in restrictive spaces, NGO's try an overcome barriers via careful dialogues and dissent strategies. If there are certain successful examples, of such advocacy strategies we would be able to prepare ourselves for the worst conditions. It also difficult to completely categorise such enviroment, because there will always be certain sectors which are completely centralised and non-invasive. Let's hear it from our coursemates if they have worked in such situations, and managed to come out successful.

It is important to note the right context to use inorder to have a successful advocacy.
Also through the theory of change we can identify what activities to do that can prevent the problem from rasing in the very first place.

It is important to note the right context to use inorder to have a successful advocacy.
Also through the theory of change we can identify what activities to do that can prevent the problem from rasing in the very first place.

It is important to note the right context to use inorder to have a successful advocacy.
Also through the theory of change we can identify what activities to do that can prevent the problem from rasing in the very first place.

It is important to note the right context to use inorder to have a successful advocacy.
Also through the theory of change we can identify what activities to do that can prevent the problem from rasing in the very first place.

It is important to note that three things must be put into consideration while advocating.
Motivation
Timing
Framing
All these when used well will lead to a successful advocacy.

I have difficulties to think about a country that would really be an open context. Is'nt it always, at least, a semi-open context ? It's seems to me that there will always be some kind of repercussion if you go against a main political idea. Would someone maybe have an personal example of an open context ?

I fully agree, with both fully understanding the problem you are seeking to solve and your environment, your work will likely fail or be perceived as tone deaf. We probably have all seen examples of well-meaning projects falling flat.

yes, true that

advocacy and political context are closely interlinked and depends on each other

Many countries are operating semi-open and restrictive context forms; except the Non- profit organizations are ready to dance to the tune of the policie makers/politicians they may not really get quality aid and support.

It is very important to understand that most NGOs act as co-implementing partners of government projects and help the government in fundraising for some programs. therefore, it is always important for NGOs to understand the political environment in the area of operation

I'm about to test this in my own organization with education around transgender issues, bringing to light the increased violence and death amongst the population. It's interesting that I'm taking this course at the same time because I don't feel like the context in the organization is appropriate for the topic but I'm not the only one advancing these ideas. So we shall see how it goes. I hope the learning fairs well for the majority of people that are exposed to the topic.

Yes, as the instructors said, even I also from the part of Semi-Open. Democracy is on the time elections but its nor prolonged or prevailed once they got elected. Its kind of roles in movies from being protagonist to become a participant when the elections got over...

I believe that the first step is to let the person who is suffering from a wound know, "Hey, you got a wound buddy, that's why you can't run as fast", then the second step is to try to find ways of healing the wound together.

The environment in which we operates determines the outcome of the things we are executing. If for instance the political environment is harsh, someone's mental health is affected and so the work and the outcome of the work is greatly affected. Thus advocating for a conducive open political environment is crucial in the quality of the outcome we expect

The environment in which we operates determines the outcome of the things we are executing. If for instance the political environment is harsh, someone's mental health is affected and so the work and the outcome of the work is greatly affected. Thus advocating for a conducive open political environment is crucial in the quality of the outcome we expect

The information received was informative and useful

The environment in which we operates determines the outcome of the things we are executing. If for instance the political environment is harsh, someone's mental health is affected and so the work and the outcome of the work is greatly affected. Thus advocating for a conducive open political environment is crucial in the quality of the outcome we expect

In my experience, semi-open context is very common in the education sector. Implementation of advocacy activities is favorable when all stakeholders are involved or kept in the loop during the formation of strategies.

Very informative module.

Political environment is one of the key that can make advocacy to be done effectively. In many countries advocacy may need public private partnership where the regime, the profit making organization and non profit organization need to conduct advocacy as a collective effort. A good advocacy strategy can be drafted but if there is no fair ground for it to be implemented, the advocacy become a aflop.

It is important to understand advocacy approaches and that requires analyzing the root causes of the problem we are trying to solve which can be done by being inside and understanding the problems by someone who is facing them directly.

yes, I agree with this. I think progress can often be hindered by the "grey area" of legislation and the beliefs of a governing body/stakeholders. When topics are taboo this can increase as well.

Problem identification and political context will determine how advocacy will be smoothly or roughly go through the community whom we deal with.

I think that it is critical that as an organization you pinpoint exactly what you are trying to achieve. By doing so you mitigate a lot of potential risks.

In the NGO I work with, we often shy away from relating with political office holders because we are wary of our work getting politicised. We often just want to get the work done and relate directly with the beneficiaries. However, I have learnt that one cannot run away from relating with policy makers because political will is often needed for effecting behavioural change. Secondly, the political class determine the laws that govern the development space and if they are not favourable then the work of NGOs is impeded. Right now, what matters is learning how to navigate the political space and make the political context serve an NGO's mission.

yes it good to look on that restrictive system of government will hinder us work efficiently

This is the mindset I have too. Try and avoid politicians at all costs but now the project I'm working now really needs them

Understanding the context in which you are operating is probably one of the most important building aspects of effective advocacy.

It is not possible to effectively advocate for a issue whose root-cause you do not understand. I good understanding of the cause and how the issue has evolved overtime is key to designing better advocacy strategy.

In a country that has a tough political actors like ours it's very important to map out the risk you may encounter when advocating.

It is not possible to effectively advocate for a issue whose root cause you do not understand. I good understanding of the cause and how the issue has evolved overtime is key to designing better advocacy strategy.

It is crucial to consider what you are advocating for and whether the outcome is going to be beneficial to the target audience. Again, knowing the kind of environment you are working in is equally important to know which approach works better.
The strategies must also be tailor suit specifically for what problem you are solving because what worked for project A might not work for B.

It is important to contextualize the government in your country. This will help you to decide on the strategy/tactics to use in advocacy.

I agree with you. Understanding your political context and creating effective strategies to implement advocacy is one key and basic foundation to efficient advocacy

What a better way to commence this course. Importance of knowing your politcal environment cannot be over discussed. it detemines the system of engagement and the success therefore. Also, knowing the root of the problem will aslo help in determine the rule of engagement. Thanks for the great insights

Once you identify the root cuase then you can apply means to either eliminate the resistance or the objection, and by that allow the conversation.

It is good knowing the political environment that will help you to the risk involved if you will carry out the advocacy and how to mitigate it, it also help you to know your limit and delimitation

Sure identifying root cause is key, but contextualization gives you guidance

it was interesting to learn and hear the three approaches of political context: open, semi open and restrictive. I was feeling these 3 levels but I couldn't categorize it like this before.
Thank you,

Politicians hold power and power influences decisions on a number of issues that affect the common people. Understanding the political environment in which an NGO operates is very key to realization of project/ program outcomes and impact. Carefully choosing who hold the power and how to engage them should be given utmost consideration.

Thank you for this..in my country we have a restrictive political system unlike some countries who do have a semi open political system,it's restrictive in the sense that you choose to be open and be an advocate for despotism,and any other files you are either threatened or even assassinated,and most NGOs who still have the courage to speak do that with hidden identity

I agree, It is essential for an organization to consider and understand the approach of their advocacy depending on the political environment they are working in in order to mitigate and be able to adapt to the level of context they are in without compromising their goal.

For advocacy to be successful and also ensure safety of those working with you, its important to take into consideration and plan according to the political context of the environment you are working in. Different places may require you to switch up your advocacy strategy depending on its context, what worked today may not work a few days, weeks, months or years later.

Advocacy is one way of speaking for those whose voices can not be heard(being a voice to the voiceless), but the question is a you doing for the good of the public or just for personal interests, knowing the root cause for the problem before finding solutions matters a lot because it is the focal point and a guiding line. Stakeholders in Government, NGO's, Organizations should uphold their roles and ensure that transparency exists, principle of accountability applies because each one has to stand accountable for the offices, work entrusted with them.

For advocacy to achieve its objectives depending on the topic chosen, a suitable advocacy approach should be taken but best on the root cause of the problem because if the root cause of the problem is identified then one is able to outline all the possible solutions to the problem and it will help in writing the objectives of the advocacy work study.

The problems can be best identified and solved by involving the target audience. But the political context has a greater role in advocacy than we might admit.
This has been a major challenge in Community Development work.

Figuring out where you stand in regards to open, semi-open and restrictive context seems to me to be a key factor in success or failure. Although any advocacy work is likely to get push back, true and powerful opposition is something we must be prepared for.

thank you very much for this.

The issue of political context becomes more crucial to me having listening to our facilitators. It has made me see that political context can actually be the defining factor between success and failure of similar solutions proposed for people in various countries.

i will check out the material you talked about.

In the country where I was born and raised, it is increasingly difficult to determine whether Indonesia has a restrictive or semi-open political environment. This is due to the increasing number of regulations in the Electronic Information and Transactions Law which makes the space for freedom of expression increasingly narrow.

Contextualization is very important as it helps understand the situation and strategize on the best way to improve the quality of the situation.

totally agree. implementing measures that can make a political system open or at least semi-open, the rights and the level of progress and personal growth of each individual would be respected and taken into account, which after all is what is pursued with this type of programs.

The context in which a type of advocacy can be applicable cannot be overemphasized; especially if the political atmosphere is unfavorable to the supremacy of the rule of law and has no regard for the voice or opinion of the people of the land. it could result to serious fatalities. Advocacy of itself is a dicey subject and strategies should be considers within the pillars of policy makers, advocators and the stake holders who understands and also might have experienced the problem that is the core of the advocacy.

I agree with those who are saying there are very few or even no open contexts. There is a very large number of semi open contexts. Likely the majority of countries in the world function under a semi open framework as I understand it, while few fall under restrictive. The country I am working from falls closer to the restrictive side of the spectrum, while my home country falls closer to the open side of the spectrum, but both would be considered semi open.

To venture into act of advocacy, one must as a matter of importance identify the problem, what are the causes of the problem. It after doing this that one can frame a possible solution and fashion out the best way to implement the solution.

My take is that contextualized advocacy is important,because it enables organisations anaylize the root cause of the problem being dealt with and often times the problems are linked to poor governance, unfriendly and unequitable polices that
deprives development in all Government sectors.

It is necessary to go beyond identifying the political environment an NGO is operating in to understanding the reason why that state/country adopts/practices that type of governance. Then aligning the project's goals with that of the political system will lead to less resistance from the latter and better success for the initiative.

It is necessary to go beyond identifying the political environment an NGO is operating in to understanding the reason why that state/country adopts/practices that type of governance. Then aligning the project's goals with that of the political system will lead to less resistance from the latter and better success for the initiative.

It is disheartening that advocacy in so many parts of the world must be approached with such caution and fear of retaliation from political agencies under which they are governed given that advocacy is meant to encourage positive change and promote just and fair reformation of behaviors or policies where Basic human rights have been trampled upon. I am blessed to live in a country where laws have been implemented to protect the rights of citizens to speak out against corruption, discrimination, and all forms of injustice which might be inclined to change with advocacy properly applied. The concern of advocate safety in areas governed by tyranny albeit eradicates their effectiveness for change.

Given the three contexts, as stated, I agree majority are semi open especially here in Africa, and understanding this helps you strategize how to undertake advocacy in such an environment

That the political environment is important for advocacy is clear, restrctive, open or semi-open. You would then choose which it is and adjust accordingly. Are there situations where the politics is that bad that there's no advocacy at all? Probably not, one may simply choose in which areas to advocate, am I wrong here?

I agree with the statement because when you know well the root cause of the problem, you define well the strategies of advocacy.

I agree with the statement because when you know well the root cause of the problem, you define well the strategies of advocacy.

very interesting start! I analyze the work of non-governmental organizations in my country and those with whom I have worked very rarely think about the risks they may face when doing advocacy. And it is very important to initially plan a strategy and consider all the risks in order to take care of the people who are involved. and understanding the context, accepting realities, helps prepare for risks in a more meaningful way.

I've been facing such a problem which is already been discussed , in our Arab society we are having an international case about Palestine and actually it was the first reason that get me to take this course , and I can't even decide whether who's working on advocating this case is a NGO or a governmental institution , because who's really advocating are people through media and newspaper. still a hard thing to do cause there's not specific supporter but people's speeches .

This is a very important start for me. in my country right now ALL CSOs that are working on anything related to governance are being followed up. already 54 organizations have been suspended form operations. Some of the organizations' bank account have been frozen and these organizations listed as funding terrorism. All of us are in fear!
So this is a very good introduction form me.
With regard to the awesome ideas shared here i have this to say:

1. i have seen that when NGOs/CSOs gain some level of 'working with the government or government ministry/Department/Agency' they tend to think that they can not be attacked. But with what has happened here, this is a wrong mentality. and it shows that this analysis of the political context must be done all the time.
2. This point relates to one of the contributors here who said that the political environment is dynamic. Yes! it is. it is with regard to national level , sub national and community levels; with regard to regimes that come and go; with regard to geographic locations within the same countries.
   The conclusion then is start with this analysis, and maintain this analysis throughout the lifetime of the organization. Thank you.

Most nations have restrictive political context which they pride in in terms of cyber security, economics , social development and the likes, however, this act in itself is a limitation to any advocacy strategy

Most nations have restrictive political context which they pride in in terms of cyber security, economics , social development and the likes, however, this act in itself is a limitation to any advocacy strategy

We have started to work with the government just recently. We have our planned KRAs and we have to advocate very strongly what change we intend to bring. This module has cleared many basic concepts.

I agree it is important to identify the problem within its context. It would be difficult to solve a problem where the political environment is just but a hurdle. Problem solving involves the political stream too (Kingdon, 1984). Identifying the context will enable NGOs to identify and use a viable advocacy approach.

I would want to hope NGO are open but I don't believe that is the case when involved in politics. I have my different persectives on what we as NGO's should be sharing with the people especially if we want to use the people to adovacy for. If its about the people then I see no harm in being open.

It's import to note that context matters. Even for the same problem, context will influence what solutions are feasible.

While I agree with different contributors to the discussion, I respect the fact that we are all operating in different countries with varying contexts. That said, yes it is important for advocacy practitioners to learn and understand their respective environments. In as much as we understand the problem at hand that we would like to advocate for, is it extremely important to get a buy-in from the authorities in the jurisdiction of the problem we are trying to solve.

I work for UNICEF and the UN mandate is to help host governments to implement their development plans. Can you imagine how the UN in any country would achieve their agenda if they did not understand the various political climates in the countries they are serving?

Imagine the context of Afghanistan right now, as much as different organizations may not be ready to recognize the new leadership and they still need to deliver humanitarian assistance and response to the people of Afghanistan, they will need to engage with the new leadership and all the more reason to understand and their political manifesto and agenda in order for the different agencies to be able to effectively carry out their advocacy work.
Thank you,
Betty.

I agree. I think it's necessary to know root causes from the communities we are working with.

These days, it seems a lot of environments that are open are moving to being semi-open, and semi-open ones are drifting towards becoming restrictive.

It is sad that is the bare truth with many jurisdictions around the world, but mine is a rare one considering that about two months ago we experienced a turnaround from a semi open context, which was almost degenerating into a restrictive one, into an open one.

Having a clear understanding of the problem you are trying to solve as an organization is vital because it gives you an idea of the existing government policies in connection with your work as an NGO and how you can co-exist or implement your intervention.

Ahhh .... the devil is in the details

I agreed, however, I will add that it's very important to also study the kind of government environment we occupy for a proper and successful advocating. Knowing this will help one to know how to go about his or her advocating path.

Wow, I love what our instructors had just given to us, their message is very true.. However, I will also add that we also need to take note that sometimes, the political world can infiltrate the NGOs world.. bringing politics into the office environment, thereby leading to divisions.. Where there is divisions, there will be frictions and this will affect effective and smooth run of activities within the NGOs

Wow, I love what our instructors had just given to us, their message is very true.. However, I will also add that we also need to take note that sometimes, the political world can infiltrate the NGOs world.. bringing politics into the office environment, thereby leading to divisions.. Where there is divisions, there will be frictions and this will affect effective and smooth run of activities within the NGOs

I am looking forward to session 6 to learn more about the risks that I may be exposed to with my advocacy.

Yes, I think that's actually true. I think to also better advocate, maybe try getting into the people's shoes and have a feel of what they're going through and how to best help them. Because if you don't truly understand the need/problem your advocacy will be ineffective

we work in a very hostile political environment whereby all actions are interpreted politically. this environment sometimes holds us back. as for the advocacy we tried to work online before but the outcome was not satisfying because many people were not able to access the internet. how do we avoid that and become more effective with our advocacy?

Quite insightful. The political contexts aid a lot when making assumptions

My country's political climate is very very restrictive. One needs a water tight strategy to avoid rubbing the government the wrong way.

I agree with you that knowing the political environment and context is important. we have to try to know the political environment before we make an advocacy strategy, knowing the political context and environment of the area where we are going to work would affect our advocacy strategy and help us in reaching our goal.

i strongly agree with you

Understanding the political environment is important to have a successful advocacy and not to land into government trouble

to define the problem

In my opinion, it is essential that we always seek as a society an increasingly open and transparent political environment. I'm sure that advocacy work still makes more gains in an open environment, managing to "build more bridges" for our causes and for a population.

I am new at this advocacy thing. I just kind of got led into it by helping some friends out. From the very beginning I couldnt believe the rights he was just not given. I immediately stepped in and had to help. I learned very quickly how the operations were to work on their end, and I must say now by just starting this I have most definitely learned just how important it was to know the political aspect of this ordeal.

for me the socio-political environment in which we find ourselves strongly influences our advocacy strategy

I feel in terms of advocacy we hare regression faster then progressing. We should be seeing more open systems, but of late we are bypassing the semi open and seeing more and more closed systems. Making the advocacy sector even more difficult.

    Advocation is a much needed skill for all areas of political and ngo's, for the purpose of direct line of nominal support systems.

Often we only consider advocacy with political leaders - to bring about change at the political level, but there may be other levels of influence, for example religious leaders, traditional leaders etc, who might also have the power to make changes that we want to see.